Charges Announced for Soldier Accused of Leaking Video

Jul6 6, 2010

NY TIMES– An Army soldier in Iraq who was arrested for leaking a video of a deadly American helicopter attack here in 2007 has also been charged with downloading more than 150,000 highly classified diplomatic cables that could, if made public, reveal the inner workings of American embassies around the world, the military here announced on Tuesday.

The full contents of the cables remain unclear but according to formal charges filed on Monday, it appeared that a disgruntled soldier working at a remote base east of Baghdad gathered some of the most guarded, if not always scandalous secrets of American diplomacy. He disclosed at least 50 of the cables “to a person not entitled to receive them.”

With the charges, a case that stemmed from the furor over a graphic and fiercely contested video of an American helicopter killing 12 people, including a reporter and a driver for Reuters, mushroomed into a far more extensive and potentially embarrassing leak. The charges cited only one cable by name, “Reykyavik 13,” which appeared to be one made public by Wikileaks.org, a Web site devoted to disclosing the secrets of governments and corporations. The website decoded and in April made public an edited version of the helicopter attack in a film it called “Collateral Murder.”

In the cable, dated January 13, the American deputy chief of mission, Sam Watson, detailed private discussions he held with Iceland’s leaders over a referendum on whether to repay losses from a bank failure, including a frank assessment that Iceland could default in 2011. (The referendum failed, but negotiations continue.)

Wikileaks, which reportedly operated in the country for a time, disclosed a second cable from Iceland in March profiling the country’s leaders, including Prime Minister Johanna Sigurdardottir.

Although hardly sensational in tone, the cable does reveal a complaint over the “alleged use of Icelandic airspace by CIA-operated planes” by the Icelandic ambassador to the United States, Albert Jonsson, who is described as “prickly but pragmatic.” r Such are the sorts of assessments diplomats go to great lengths to keep private.

Wikileaks has not acknowledged receiving the cables or video from the analyst, Private First Class Bradley E. Manning, 22, whose case has been the subject of vigorous debate between defenders and critics. Private Manning, who served with the Second Brigade of the 10th Mountain Division, based at Contingency Operating Station Hammer, was arrested in May and transferred to a military detention center in Kuwait after allegedly revealing his activities in online chats with a former computer hacker, who turned him in to the authorities.

Read full article HERE.

© COPYRIGHT NY TIMES, 2010

Four Journalists File Police Complaints After G20 Arrests

(Video Below)

NATIONAL POST– A Toronto-based lawyer representing four journalists, who filed complaints with Ontario’s police watchdog and claimed that police physically assaulted and threatened to sexually assault the female reporters during the G20 summit, is calling for a full investigation into the alleged violence.

On Tuesday, Jesse Rosenfeld, Amy Miller, Daniel McIsaac and Lisa Walter each filed complaints about their arrests during the G20 summit with the Office of Independent Police Review Director.

Julian Falconer is representing the “Free Press 4” group.

“From our point of view, if peaceful protesters and journalists engaged in peaceful coverage are treated this way, this is a sad day for democracy. My clients are seeking accountability for what appears to be a serious overreaction by some police officers,” he said in a written statement.

Toronto Police spokesman Mark Pugash said there were more than 100 cameras documenting everything that happened in the prisoner processing centres and on the streets so “it’s not someone’s word against someone else’s.”

“We have video of everything. We’ll make sure that we provide the best possible evidence to determine the truth or otherwise in these allegations,” he said.

Police “anticipated” people would make complaints.

“We have to consider the possibility that complaints are completely unfounded. There are people who have said things so far that are clearly lies,” Pugash said.

Rosenfeld, a 26-year-old freelancer for the Guardian, a U.K.-based newspaper, was arrested when he was covering a group of demonstrators in front of a downtown Toronto hotel on Saturday night.

He said one officer told his colleague, “that’s the loudmouth kid who was mouthing off to me yesterday” and the officials didn’t bother to confirm his credentials. Instead, Rosenfeld said the officers “jumped” him.

“I was grabbed on each side and hit in the stomach and back and pounced on by officers. I kept asking them why they were beating me because I wasn’t resisting arrest. But they lifted my leg and twisted my ankle.”
Rosenfeld alleged he was also kneed in the ribs.

In Amy Miller’s complaint she said officers threatened to sexually assault her.

“You’re going to be raped. We always like the pretty ones. We’re going to wipe the grin off your face when we gang bang you. We know how the Montreal girls roll,” her complaint read.

Miller is a Montreal-based freelance journalist with The Dominion, a monthly paper published by a network of independent journalists.

Miller said the officers called her accreditation “garbage” and told her to get a “real job.”

OIPRD director Gerry McNeilly said all complaints are screened for “validity” and the investigation is then handed to the police division or to McNeilly’s office.

McNeilly must decide to group the “Free Press 4” complaints or look at them individually.

“I have the ability but I haven’t made the decision. If I say a complaint has no validity, that’s final. There’s no appeal, so I have to look at each case very carefully,” McNeilly said.

“I hoped the G20 had proceeded with minimum interruption and disruption but the complaints are coming in and we’re going to deal with them in a way that’s transparent.”

OIPRD spokesperson Allison Hawkins said the office receives, on average, 80 complaints a week. Between June 20 and June 26, 95 complaints were filed.

The civilian-led organization, which formed last October, investigates public complaints against the province’s police associations.

By Carmen Chai

Police brutality against women in Toronto at the G20

 

© COPYRIGHT NATIONAL POST, 2010

Is BP Rejecting Skimmers to Save Money on Gulf Oil Cleanup?

TRUTHOUT– From Washington to the Gulf, politicians and residents wonder why so few skimming vessels have been put to work soaking up oil from the Deepwater Horizon catastrophe.

Investment banker Fred D. McCallister of Dallas believes he has the answer. McCallister, vice president of Allegiance Capital Corp. in Dallas, has been trying since June 5 to offer a dozen Greek skimming vessels from a client for the cleanup.

“By sinking and dispersing the oil, BP can amortize the cost of the cleanup over the next 15 years or so, as tar balls continue to roll up on the beaches, rather than dealing with the issue now by removing the oil from the water with the proper equipment,” McCallister testified earlier this week before the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation. “As a financial adviser, I understand financial engineering and BP’s desire to stretch out its costs of remediating the oil spill in the Gulf. By managing the cleanup over a period of many years, BP is able to minimize the financial damage as opposed to a huge expenditure in a period of a few years.”  

A BP spokesman from Houston, Daren Beaudo, denied the allegation emphatically. He said, “Our goal throughout has been to minimize the amount of oil entering the environment and impacting the shoreline.”

A report released Thursday by the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform included a photo depicting “a massive swath of oil” in the Gulf with no skimming equipment in sight. The report concluded: “The lack of equipment at the scene of the spill is shocking, and appears to reflect what some describe as a strategy of cleaning up oil once it comes ashore versus containing the spill and cleaning it up in the ocean.”

McCallister’s experience in trying to win approval for the Greek vessels, along with the frustrations others have expressed in offering specialized equipment, contradicts the official pronouncements from BP and the federal government about the approval process. For foreign vessels, that process is complicated by a 1920 maritime law known as the Jones Act.

Coast Guard Rear Adm. James Watson, who oversees the Unified Command catastrophe response in New Orleans, determined in mid-June an insufficient number of U.S. skimming vessels is available to clean up oil, essentially exempting from the federal Jones Act foreign vessels that could be used in the response, said Capt. Ron LaBrec, a spokesman at Coast Guard headquarters in Washington.

The Jones Act allows only vessels that are U.S. flagged and owned to carry goods between U.S. ports.

To further clarify, Coast Guard Adm. Thad Allen, the national incident commander, promised expedited Jones Act waivers for any essential spill-response activities. “Should any waivers be needed,” Allen said at the time, “we are prepared to process them as quickly as possible to allow vital spill response activities being undertaken by foreign-flagged vessels to continue without delay.”

LaBrec said 24 foreign vessels, two of them skimming vessels, have operated around the catastrophe site, in federal waters with no need for Jones Act waivers. He also said Watson has the authority to approve operation of foreign-flagged vessels near shore, where the Jones Act comes into play because of the port restrictions.

Says Fred D. McCallister, Vice President, Allegiance Capital Corporation:

 “If the unified area commander (Watson) decides that it’s a piece of equipment he needs, either BP would contract for it or he can do that himself,” LaBrec said. “If it’s something he decides is absolutely needed, he can get it in here without BP approval.

“The equipment that has been offered — the foreign equipment that has been offered that is useful for the response — has either been accepted or is in the group of offers that is currently in the process of being accepted. That has been occurring since early in the response and will continue to occur.”

Dealing with BP

McCallister said none of his dealings have been with the Coast Guard. He submitted requests for Jones Act waivers to Unified Command, but said questions about the skimming vessels have come from BP.

BP spokesman Beaudo said McCallister was notified his offer of skimming vessels has been declined because the vessels will not pick up heavy oil near shore. Beaudo said he did not know when McCallister was informed. McCallister said he received communications from BP on Thursday that indicated his proposal was still under review. In fact, he sent supplemental material Thursday, which was accepted, to show the skimming vessels will pick up heavy oil like that bombarding Mississippi’s coastline. The 60-foot vessels, he said, can skim high-density crude up to 20 miles offshore. Equipment on board separates the oil from water.

Desperate for skimmers

All the Gulf states dealing with oil have pleaded for more skimming vessels. The Deepwater Horizon Web site indicates 550 “skimmers” were at work before bad weather suspended operations.

Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour’s office has ordered private shipyards to build skimming vessels because so few have been working in state waters. George Malvaney, who heads the Mississippi Coast cleanup effort for BP subcontractor U.S. Environmental Services, said offers of skimming vessels and other equipment take time to review. He believes Mississippi will have a “substantial skimming effort” by late next week.

“Just because it’s a skimmer doesn’t mean it’s effective,” Malvaney said. “There’s a lot of people out there saying, ‘We’ve got skimmers.’ Some are effective, some are not. That’s what we’re trying to wade through right now.”

More than Meets the Eye?

As the catastrophe reaches Day 73, McCallister, who grew up in Mississippi and has family on the Coast, believes there is just more to it.

“Looking at it from a businessman’s perspective,” he said, “if I am BP, assuming I don’t have a conscience that would steer me otherwise, the best thing I can do for my shareholders, my pensioners, and everybody else, is to try to spread the cost of this remediation out as long as I can.

“I am concerned it is seen by BP as being the most pragmatic financial approach. But they’re playing Russian roulette with the Gulf, the marine life in the Gulf and the people in the Gulf region.”

Written by Anita Lee for McClatchy

© COPYRIGHT TRUTHOUT, 2010

Robert Gates Tightens Rules for Military and the Media

HUFFINGTON POST– Defense Secretary Robert Gates ordered military officials Friday to get Pentagon clearance for interviews and other media contacts after President Barack Obama fired the top general in Afghanistan for embarrassing comments in a magazine article.

Gates’ order, which is effective immediately, tells officials to make sure they are not going out of bounds or unintentionally releasing information that the Pentagon wants to hold back.

The order was issued in a brief memo sent to military and civilian personnel worldwide. It does not spell out exactly how the new directive will work but appears to require hundreds or thousands of officers to funnel interview requests through a small central office at the Pentagon.

“I am concerned that the department has grown lax in how we engage with the media,” Gates wrote.

“We have far too many people talking to the media outside of channels, sometimes providing information which is simply incorrect, out of proper context, unauthorized, or uninformed by the perspective of those who are most knowledgeable,” about how the information may fit into larger government operations or goals.

The order, first reported by The New York Times on its website Friday night, has been in the works since long before Gen. Stanley McChrystal stunned his bosses with criticism and complaints in a Rolling Stone article that his superiors did not know was coming.

“We were not happy with the content, and we were not happy that we didn’t know about it,” Assistant Defense Secretary Douglas Wilson said this week.

Read more HERE.

© COPYRIGHT HUFFINGTON POST, 2010

G20: More Than a Billion Spent on Security, Leaders Agree to Disagree

ALTERNET– What is supposed to be a forum for deliberation and the development of agreements on global economic governance was an utter failure. In the end, over a billion dollars was spent to build a temporary system of apartheid in Toronto to keep protesters out so that the twenty most wealthy countries in the world could agree to disagree on what to do about the state of the global economy.

Somewhere between a billion and two billion dollars was spent in the end on the G20 in Toronto (and the G8 meeting in Huntsville). It was used to create a fake lake, a fence around the city (a veritable apartheid wall) to keep protesters out, and it was used to enforce a regulation that gave police secret arrest powers that never went through the legislature.

The Toronto Star reported:

“the regulation kicked in Monday and will expire June 28, the day after the summit ends. While the new regulation appeared without notice on the province’s e-Laws online database last week, it won’t be officially published in The Ontario Gazette until July 3 — one week after the regulation expires.

According to the new regulation, “guards” appointed under the act can arrest anyone who, in specific areas, comes within five metres of the security zone.

Within those areas, police can demand identification from anyone coming within five metres of the fence perimeter and search them. If they refuse, they face arrest. Anyone convicted under the regulation could also face up to two months in jail or a $500 maximum fine.

The security was characterized by Toronto Star’s Catherine Porter as “the Miami Model.” The reference goes back to seven years ago when the Free Trade Area of the Americas summit took place.

Porter explained that “Manny Diaz, Miami’s then-mayor, called the police methods exemplary–a model to be followed by homeland security when confronting protesters” while “human rights groups including Amnesty International called it a model of police brutality and intimidation.”

From an interview with Naomi Archer, an indigenous rights worker from North Carolina, Porter outlined how the main identifiers of the “Miami Model” are: information warfare, intimidation, always suggesting the protesters triggered the violence, and congratulating themselves after all is said and done no matter what brutality took place at their hands.

State Repression of Journalists, G20 Protesters

The following is just a handful or small combination of the many videos and first-hand written accounts from those who were there at the G20 in Toronto attempting to exercise the right to assemble peacefully and protest.

-Amy Miller, independent journalist, discusses the threats of rape that were made against women in the detention center. She also details how guards in the center were strip-searching, traumatizing and sexually abusing prisoners by fingering some of the women who had been detained.

Amy Miller – Alternative Media Centre, Independent Journalist (VIDEO)

-Stefan Christoff, an independent journalist who was targeted prior to the G20 and featured on last Friday’s edition of Democracy Now! details the attacks on protesters who gathered for jail solidarity actions outside the detention center.

-A Guardian journalist (a newspaper from the UK) was assaulted, arrested, as were numerous others even if they had press credentials to prove they were “legitimate” members of the press who had a right to be covering the police and the protesters

-A large march and rally against the meeting of the G20 ended in police attacks against peaceful protesters and video journalist Brandon Jourdan in Queens Park.

(VIDEO)

-Community organizers, while on the way to a press conference, were targeted by plainclothes officers refusing to show badge numbers or identification.

(VIDEO)

-Calls to Amnesty International were made to report on the “illegal, immoral and dangerous” conditions at the detention center, where detained protesters were being held up to 35 hours without food, refused water or given as little as an ounce every 12 hours, subjected to “over-filled” cages, delayed processing, put into solitary confinement, refused the use of pillows or mattresses, forced to endure non-stop light exposure/loss of natural light rhythm/sensory deprivation (interrogation techniques used on Guantanamo detainees), subjected to extreme cold (another interrogation technique used on Guantanamo detainees), and sexually harassed.

There were peaceful protests. Most likely, few saw these images unless they sought them out.

(VIDEO)

A video like the one above doesn’t match the idea that protesters were a danger to the well-being of small businesses, people in the city, and those who were failing to come to agreement on how to tackle the economic crisis.

That’s why the police probably used agents provocateurs; their needed to be at least one incident to justify the level of police state brutality being utilized against protesters.

The images and video of police cars up and flames have raised many questions. Given the history of agents provocateurs in Canada, Cory Doctorow explored the possibility that police had incited the violence that many have linked to black bloc protesters who were at the G20. (Global Research also has an article up looking at the shoes the police and the alleged provocateur were wearing.)

G20 Leaders’ “Final Communique”

This only scratches the surface of all that went on. Instead of focusing on each incident individually, what about considering all the security and repression in the context of the discussion at the G20? What were leaders deliberating behind the apartheid fence built to keep protesters out? Why was it so important that the protesters get nowhere near the site where leaders were discussing global economics?

Naomi Klein, author of The Shock Doctrine who has been covering globalization, trade and disaster capitalism for more than a decade, explained on Democracy Now! on the Monday right after the G20 that she thought the “real crime scene” was “what actually happened at the summit on Sunday night.”

Klein explained that the “communiqué” would not levy even a measly tax on banks to help pay for the global crisis banks had created and prevent future crises. No financial transaction tax to create fund for social programs and action on climate change would be created. And, Klein added, “real action to eliminate subsidies for fossil fuel companies” that they have created many social and environmental problems for the world would not take place.

On what the G20 did do, Klein said:

“”What there would be was very decisive action on deficit reductions. These leaders announced that they would halve their deficits by 2013, which is shocking and brutal cut. You know, I don’t believe–maybe some of the leaders intend on keeping–making good on this promise, but, on the other hand, they can hide behind this promise as the excuse to do what a lot of them want to do anyway, and say, you know, “We have no choice; we made this commitment.” But so, just to put this in perspective, if the US were to cut its deficit, its projected 2010 deficit, in half by 2013, that would be a cut of $780 billion, you know, if there were no tax increases in that period.

So, you know, that’s why I wrote the piece that came out this morning in Canada’s national newspaper The Globe and Mail, that what actually happened at the summit is that the global elites just stuck the bill for their drunken binge with the world’s poor, with the people who are most vulnerable, because that is really who’s going to pay, when they balance their budgets on the backs of healthcare programs, pension programs, unemployment programs. And also, the other thing that they did at this G8 summit, that preceded the G20 summit, is admit that they were not meeting their commitments to doubling aid to Africa, once again, because of the debt that was created by saving the banks.”

Indigenous natives of Canada reminded all protesters that indigenous rights are the first to go and the first people to be impacted because of the policies that the leaders in the G20 push and promote.

Arthur Manuel, former chief of the Neskonlith Band in British Columbia and spokesperson for the Indigenous Network on Economies and Trade, explained on Democracy Now!:

“…basically indigenous people are the first ones that are impacted by the major sort of resource extraction-type industries that these big conferences actually, you know, engender in their strategies, you know? And so, we have to let–you know, we are part of the whole process, you know, in the sense that we’re the people that are hurt at the community level, in terms of hunting and fishing and food gathering that we depend on. It doesn’t matter if it’s just North America, but it could be anywhere, in Central, South America, in Asia, you know, all around the world. There’s like 370 million indigenous people globally, you know?…”

Indigenous people have been challenging the environmental impacts of “proposed massive pipelines that would carry Canadian tar sands oil 2,000 miles from northern Alberta all the way down to refineries in Texas and tankers off the Gulf Coast.” Not surprisingly, BP is trying to get into the dirty energy game of tar sands or resource extraction and environmental degradation of land in Canada.

In the end, what the National Post wrote about the G20 as it concluded may bemost apt:

“…the Toronto summits represent a near total collapse of efforts to create some kind of overarching centre of global economic power. Despite repeated reference to strong collective commitments to international cooperation, sustainable development and macroeconomic co-ordination, the G8/G20 separately and jointly agreed to go their own ways and avoid collective action as much as possible.

On everything from deficit reduction to climate change, from financial regulation to trade, foreign aid, currencies and Afghanistan, the G20 ultimately marched off in 20 separate directions.

Reality trumped fantasy in Toronto, the fantasy being that leaders can legally or would even want to commit their nations to the objectives of an unelected collective of political leaders from the four corners of the world — as if leaders from China, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, Brazil and elsewhere could set global policy by some kind of balloted consensus at a weekend meeting. Mr. Harper, in his wrap-up news conference yesterday, acknowledged the pre-eminence of national sovereignty. Everything the G20 does is “voluntary,” he said in answer to a question about the deficit targets. “Everything is voluntary that we do here, because we are sovereign countries.” U.S. President Barack Obama put it more starkly: “Every country is unique, and every country will chart its own course”…

Over ten thousand community activists engaged in a US Social Forum in Detroit. Over ten thousand regularly engage in World Social Forums that have been organized since January 2001 when the first Forum was held in Porto Alegre, Brazil.

Those who have participated in the World Social Forums or the US Social Forums in the past decade know every country is not unique and every country should not chart its own course.

All humanity is connected. What one country does has repercussions in all the countries of the world.

That any leader would utter such quotes that appeal to an ideology supportive of unilateralism and conflict is unacceptable and should be loudly condemned by all the people of the world.

Yet, that’s the story of the G20–Twenty leaders coming together to say what they want for their country. Twenty leaders ultimately agreeing to disagree and let each country carry out their own agenda. Twenty leaders planning to meet again to do the same and to drop a billion more dollars to militarize the area outside of where the next meeting will be.

Twenty leaders displaying utter disregard for humanity, a love for free trade or global capitalism, and tacit support for police state repression so they can decide to not agree in peace.

Twenty leaders who don’t want to be inconvenienced by the pratfalls of the global economy they have created, who are perfectly okay with forcing those that they govern to foot the tab for their excess and bourgeois view of how to handle the political and economic future of the world.

Kevin Gosztola is a trusted author for OpEdNews.com who has sought refuge in Chicago from the red state of Indiana for four years now but who has over the past years contemplated returning to help kickstart a real progressive movement in northern Indiana where he was born. He publishes to United Progressives, The Seminal, Open Salon and recently launched a blog on Alternet called Moving Train Media. He is a 2009 Young People For Fellow and a documentary filmmaker who will graduate with a Film/Video B.A. degree from Columbia College in Chicago in the Spring 2010. He co-organized a major arts & media summit called “Art, Access & Action,” which explored the intersection of politics, art and media and was supported by Free Press. He covered the 2008 Democratic and Republican National Conventions. He covered the controversy around Obama’s invitation to speak at Notre Dame’s graduation, Operation Rescue’s “Keep It Closed Campaign” against Dr. Carhart, the “Showdown in Chicago,” the Tea Party rally in Chicago, and actions against the Arizona immigration law & several past antiwar rallies in Chicago. He is also a member of the Media Democracy Day Think Tank in Chicago. Kevin Gosztola most recently covered the US Social Forum in Detroit extensively. He doesn’t just write and blog about movements and struggles; he is part of those movements and struggles.

Photo by Abby Martin

© COPYRIGHT ALTERNET, 2010