November 8,
2011
MEDIA ROOTS- As the pro-democracy ‘Arab Spring’
movement spread across North Africa and beyond, Euroamerican imperialists sent a stern message by responding with draconian violence. In Libya, US-NATO forces perpetrated crimes against humanity under the pretext of combating alleged crimes against humanity.
President Obama gloated as NATO advanced in Libya, then cheered the brutal assassination of Gaddafi, who was sodomised with a
knife before being extrajudicially executed. Soon thereafter, the U.S. corporate propaganda machine launched its coinciding media blitz
selling the triumphalism of ‘humanitarian intervention’ in the country.
In a recent article, “NATO’s War Crimes in Libya,” James Petras describes how Libya’s standing with the U.S. and U.K. suddenly soured without provocation. In fact, Euroamerican imperialists were Gaddafi supporters up until the ‘Arab Spring’ revolution toward democratic,
anti-imperialist, and independent governance became contagious.
To reassert its muscle and send a warning shot to other nations aspiring independence, Euroamerican imperialists,
via the proxy rubric of NATO, claimed to support ‘rebels’ fighting against the Gaddafi
government. And, of course, support is an
understatement– NATO brutally devastated Libyan infrastructure through sea
and air attacks paving the way for the so-called ‘rebels,’ which otherwise wouldn’t have
stood a chance.
These ‘rebels’ could scarcely claim popular support. As Petras
notes, the “casting of the rag-tag collection of monarchists, Islamist fundamentalists,
London and
Washington-based ex-pats and disaffected Gaddafi officials as ‘rebels’
is a pure case of mass media propaganda.”
Libya was made an example of by Euroamerican imperialists for many reasons. Gaddafi pursued plans for a ‘Bank of Africa,’ alternative
communication systems, and long supported African unity. Under Gaddafi, despite any demagoguery, Libya maintained the highest standard of living for any African nation. However, now smouldering after NATO’s devastation, it’s projected Libya faces a decade of reconstruction to undo the damage of being bombed back to the Stone Age.
To be
certain, Gaddafi was a complex political figure, developing from a
revolutionary to a self-styled symbolic figurehead. But
one simply needs to ask why NATO forces
haven’t targeted nations such as Saudi Arabia or Yemen for similar
‘humanitarian intervention’ to see through the glaring hypocrisy.
As historian Dr. Webster Griffin Tarpley has explained:
“Democracy
is totally irrelevant to this. This is a cynical imperialist attack aiming at
the two things that the US, the British, and the French value. On the one hand
the oil and on the other hand the water. And the water may turn out to be more
valuable than the oil… Libya will
be under IMF conditionality and that will mean the Washington consensus,
deregulation, privatization, the destruction of any state-sector that remains,
the destruction of any social welfare system, or social safety net, and the destruction of all
of those positive things that Gaddafi had done in his regime to distribute the
oil revenue to increase the general welfare.”
As
in Iraq, Euroamerican imperialists stand to benefit from ‘ruin and rule’
devastation, disaster capitalism, and the years of inevitable reconstruction contracts and continued obstruction of autonomous governance.
Messina
***
JAMES PETRAS— The NATO assault formed part of a general
counter-attack designed to contain and reverse the popular democratic and
anti-imperialist movements which had ousted or were on the verge of
overthrowing US-client dictators.
What caused the NATO countries to shift abruptly from a policy of embracing
Gaddafi to launching a brutal scorched-earth invasion of Libya in a matter of
months? The key is the popular uprisings, which threatened Euro-US
domination. The near total destruction of Libya, a secular regime with the highest
standard of living in Africa, was meant to be a lesson, a message from
the imperialists to the newly aroused masses of North Africa, Asia and Latin
America: The fate of Libya awaits any regime which aspires to greater
independence and questions the ascendancy of Euro-American power.
NATO’s savage six-month blitz – over 30,000 air and missile assaults on
Libyan civil and military institutions – was a response to those who claimed
that the US and the EU were on the “decline” and that the “empire was in decay”.
The radical Islamist and monarchist-led “uprising” in Benghazi during March
2011 was backed by and served as a pretext for the NATO imperial powers to
extend their counter-offensive on the road to neo-colonial restoration.
For all the ruling class and mass media euphoria, the ‘win’ over Libya,
grotesque and criminal in the destruction of Libyan secular society and the
ongoing brutalization of black Libyans, does not solve the profound economic
crises in the EU-US. It does not affect China’s growing competitive advantages
over its western competitors. It does not end US-Israeli isolation faced with
an imminent world-wide recognition of Palestine as an independent state. The
absence of left-wing western intellectual solidarity for independent Third World
nations, evident in their support for the imperial-based mercenary “rebels” is
more than compensated by the emergence of a radical new generation of left-wing
activists in South Africa, Chile, Greece, Spain, Egypt, Pakistan and elsewhere.
These are youth, whose solidarity with anti-colonial regimes is based on their
own experience with exploitation, “marginalization” (unemployment) and
repression at home.
Read more about NATO’s War Crimes in Libyia.
© 2011 The Official James Petras Website
***
THE GUARDIAN— As the most hopeful offshoot of the “Arab spring” so far
flowered this week in successful elections in Tunisia, its ugliest underside has
been laid bare in Libya. That’s not only, or even mainly, about the YouTube
lynching of Gaddafi, courtesy of a Nato attack on his convoy.
For the western powers, of course, the Libyan war has
allowed them to regain ground lost in Tunisia and Egypt, put themselves at the
heart of the upheaval sweeping the most strategically sensitive region in the
world, and secure valuable new commercial advantages in an oil-rich state whose
previous leadership was at best unreliable. No wonder the new British defence
secretary is telling businessmen to “pack their bags” for Libya, and
the US ambassador in Tripoli insists American companies are needed on a
“big scale”.
But for Libyans, it has meant a loss of ownership of their
own future and the effective imposition of a western-picked administration of
Gaddafi defectors and US and British intelligence assets. Probably the greatest
challenge to that takeover will now come from Islamist military leaders on the
ground, such as the Tripoli commander Abdel Hakim Belhaj – kidnapped by MI6 to
be tortured in Libya in 2004 – who have already made clear they will not be
taking orders from the NTC.
What the Libyan tragedy has brutally hammered home is that
foreign intervention doesn’t only strangle national freedom and self-determination
– it doesn’t protect lives either.
Read more about If the Libyan war was about saving lives, it
was a catastrophic failure.
© 2011 Guardian News and Media Limited
Photo by AFP/Getty
Artist List:
MEDIA ROOTS – On Wednesday, November 2, 2011, I documented an incredibly inspirational and monumental event. For the second time in sixty years, Oakland held a general strike that shut down the city– this time in response to the brutal police state crackdown on the Occupy Oakland encampment. 
MEDIA ROOTS- As the pro-democracy ‘Arab Spring’
movement spread across North Africa and beyond, Euroamerican imperialists sent a stern message by responding with draconian violence. In Libya, US-NATO forces perpetrated crimes against humanity under the pretext of combating alleged crimes against humanity.