The Fair Share of the Common Heritage

Posted on by

MEDIA ROOTS — The ‘Fair Share of the Common Heritage’ is a philosophical economic principle that every sentient being—human and non-human—has a right to a fair share of the wealth derived from the earth’s natural resources and humankind’s accumulated cultural knowledge. 

This includes all of the planet’s natural resources that human beings need to survive, as well as the technological inventions that help to progress the evolutionary consciousness of our global society.

The main crisis facing “the Commons” is the corporate privatization of resources integral to life, such as water.

Some have heard of the phrase the ‘Tragedy of the Commons,’ a theory put forth by ecologist Garrett Hardin that describes how private property is a better way to ecological preservation. According to Hardin, humans are incentivized to act in their own self-interest and will ultimately compete, abuse and deplete a resource they share in common. However, Hardin’s concept was based on many theoretical assumptions. 

Elinor Ostrom, the first woman to win a Nobel prize in Economics, has poked holes in Hardin’s theory with her trailblazing global Commons research. Via the Guardian:

“Ostrom studied what makes collective action work in irrigation systems, pastures, forests and fisheries all over the world. Co-operation to manage key resources is not automatic, but neither is the “tragedy of the commons”. Respect for collective property rights is crucial to providing the necessary incentives for people to maintain resources.” Policies of nationalising or privatising the commons have too often eroded the incentives or authority of local users to manage their resources. Ostrom showed that giving communities scope to set their own rules (PDF), ones adapted to local conditions, is important. Outsiders’ technical and local knowledge plays a role, but people are more likely to monitor and enforce rules they have had a say in setting.”

Most importantly, we shouldn’t get entrapped in the barriers of language or be imprisoned to preconceived terminology when we consider the concept of the Commons. Like Ostrom’s research shows, a combination of ideologies are put into practice that differ from community to community to manage and share the Commons.

What do you think? Get the dialogue started.

Writing, Photography and Video by Abby Martin


Abby Martin interviews Project Censored board members about the ‘Fair Share of the Common Heritage,’


“We do not have this personal ownership, per se, of one thing over another or ownership isn’t used in a heirarchical capacity.” — Mickey Huff, Director, Project Censored. 

“The basic resources that we rely upon, but also things like DNA, those basic things that nature passes on from generation to generation that we have in common,” Kenn Burrows, Professor of Holistic Studies.

2 thoughts on “The Fair Share of the Common Heritage

  1. Sorry that I am a little late to this short, to the point, essay. It is superb. Some of us, who can’t control our verbosity, admire work like this. But let me pick at a nit re the use of language.

    I agree a dispiriting tradition of sectarianism and academicism gets in the way of talking the talk. BUT, there are a variety of approaches to how the commons is viewed in a contemporary context – from liberals to Marxists – there are real differences in contextualization.

    That said, and as an apostate anthropologist, I do recognize that historically the commons was a social arena for people-centered practices that today we would refer to as stewardship.

    For me, the urban commons (as opposed to the rural one) is problematic. What to include in it? And how? Are worker cooperatives for instance little commons? Where are the boundaries, then?

    And lastly, I think with the “fair share of the commons” we have the means to begin thinking about divorcing jobs from income and begin to use the benefits from the commons as the basis for a guaranteed income for all that meets our survival needs. But that is another essay!

    For those interested in a good (radical) approach to the commons, I recommend this:

  2. Hi Abby! This is Nick from the body scammer article.

    Outstanding article! I wish people would stop using ‘privatize’ and start using ‘profitize’. Because that’s the true agenda.

    I’m huge into sustainability and am basically an ‘Eco Maniac’. I just started a sustainable building program this weekend. Hopefully I’ll be able to contribute when I’m finished.

    I’ve seen you on RT and it is truly inspiring what you’ve created and accomplished! I loved you harassing Rand Paul! LOL

    Anyway… go girl!

Leave a Reply


  • The Climate Change “Debate” and Marketization of Nature: Everyone Loses
  • How Words Absolve Pillaging and Mass Murder
  • BP’s Oil Spill: Criminal Negligence, Thousands Still Sick & A Gulf Graveyard Left Behind
  • Inside the Zeitgeist Revolution with Peter Joseph

  • RT vs. MSM Propaganda in the New Cold War
  • CIA Torture Whistleblower: Wake Up America, You’re Next
  • Why the US Won’t Give Up on Regime Change in Venezuela
  • Leaving the Set Broken
  • Never Stop Breaking the Set
  • MLK Jr. – The Uncomfortable Truths History Books Won’t Touch
  • Detroit’s Bankruptcy Dictatorship: Extinguishing the Homeless & Shutting Down Human Rights
  • Why Exceptionalism Fuels America’s Gun Massacres
  • Internationally Banned Tear Gas: For Domestic Use Only
  • Aaron Swartz and the Fight for Free Information
  • The Order to “Support the Troops” is Killing Veterans
  • How Words Absolve Pillaging and Mass Murder
  • 9/11: Warnings Ignored, US Ally Funding, Bush Admin Lies & Redacted Truths
  • BP’s Oil Spill: Criminal Negligence, Thousands Still Sick & A Gulf Graveyard Left Behind
  • Hurricane Katrina Unheard: Blackwater, White Militias & Community Empowerment