Appeals Court Rules Against Bagram Detainees

Posted on by

COMMON DREAMS– Detainees at Bagram Air Field in Afghanistan cannot use U.S. courts to challenge their imprisonment the way detainees in Guantanamo Bay have, a federal appeals court ruled Friday.

The United States is holding the detainees at the military prison on Afghan territory through a cooperative arrangement with Afghanistan, three appeals court judges said in a unanimous decision turning aside the request of a Tunisian and two Yemeni prisoners.

The jurisdiction of the U.S. courts does not extend to foreigners held at Bagram in the Afghan theater of war, added the judges, who said a U.S. district judge should have thrown out the detainees’ petitions.

“While we cannot say that extending our constitutional protections to the detainees would be in any way disruptive of that relationship” with the Afghan government, “neither can we say with certainty what the reaction of the Afghan government would be,” said the opinion written by Judge David Sentelle.

The petitions to the U.S. court system by the three men sought the same right to challenge their indefinite detention that prisoners at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, won in the U.S. Supreme Court.

During appeals court arguments in January, the other two appeals judges in the case, Harry Edwards and David Tatel, seemed to struggle with the problem of whether they could craft a narrowly constructed opinion that would affect only the three men and not lay the groundwork for opening up the judicial branch of government to many other detainee cases now and in the future.

Friday’s decision spelled out that issue and referred back to January’s argument.

“The court engaged in an extended dialog with counsel for the petitioners in which we repeatedly sought some limiting principle that would distinguish Bagram from any other military installation. Counsel was able to produce no such distinction,” the ruling noted.

Sentelle wrote that the three detainees “seem to be arguing that the fact of United States control of Bagram under the lease of the military base is sufficient … we reject this extreme understanding.”

Under that interpretation, noncitizens held in any U.S. military facility in the world arguably could challenge their detention, said the appeals court opinion.

Sentelle, the chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, is an appointee of President Ronald Reagan. Edwards was appointed by President Jimmy Carter, and Tatel by President Bill Clinton.

Written by Pete Yost

© 2010 Associated Press

Leave a Reply

RELATED NEWS

  • Empire Files: The Hidden War on Trans Rights
  • 7 Must Watch Empire Files Reports From Palestine
  • A History of the Afghanistan War, Fool’s Errand: Interview w/ Scott Horton
  • Human Rights Hypocrisy – Colombia vs. Venezuela
  • FOREIGN POLICY

  • Empire Files Podcast: How The Pentagon Runs Hollywood
  • Media Roots Radio: Neocon Tentacles into Populism, the Hudson Institute, the Doomsday Machine & Kahn !!!
  • Empire Files: Iraq Vet Disrupts George W. Bush Speech, Sept. 19 2021
  • Empire Files: Never Forget: Lessons of the Post-9/11 Warpath
  • Empire Files: Afghanistan War Pays Off BIG For Generals Who Lied
  • Media Roots Radio: Time to End the War on Terrorism & Panic Over a Multipolar World w/ Scott Horton
  • Media Roots Radio: China Derangement Syndrome, Big Pharma Opioid Erasure & Apple Fed Pedo Hunters
  • CIA Stories: The Cuban Who Conned the CIA
  • Empire Files Podcast: SOS Cuba: An Extensive Web of CIA Plots & Propaganda
  • Empire Files Podcast: BDS Victories On The Rise | feat. leaders of Block The Boat
  • Media Roots Radio: COG Measures & the War on Terrorism Horseshoe w/ Whitney Webb
  • Media Roots Radio: Cure For Havana Syndrome & Info War Against Cuba w/ Alan MacLeod
  • Empire Files Podcast: Disturbing Truth About Israel’s New Government w/ Miko Peled & Abby Martin
  • Earth’s Greatest Enemy – A New Film by Abby Martin [OFFICIAL TEASER]
  • Empire Files: CIA Stories: Death Squads in Afghanistan