How Opium is Keeping US in Afghanistan: CIA’s Shady History of Drug Trafficking

Posted on by

opiumByBeggsEven though present-day Afghanistan flies under the news radar, it remains to be the longest military quagmire in US history. Aside from troops still occupying the country, thousands of private contractors are on the ground that the Pentagon can’t even account for. Considering how Obama’s foreign policy strategy has been to replace ground troops with drone strikes, the administration’s logic behind continuing the occupation remains unclear.

War has always been about resources and control. Alongside the supposed surprise discovery of Afghanistan’s $1 trillion wealth of untapped minerals, the Taliban had successfully eradicated the opium crop in the Golden Crescent before the US invasion. Now, more than 90% of the world’s heroin comes from the war torn country.

As reported by Global Research:

“Immediately following the October 2001 invasion, opium markets were restored…By early 2002, the opium price (in dollars/kg) was almost 10 times higher than in 2000. In 2001, under the Taliban opiate production stood at 185 tons, increasing  to 3400 tons in 2002 under the US sponsored puppet regime of President Hamid Karzai.”

After more than twelve years of military occupation, Afghanistan’s opium trade isn’t just sustaining, it’s thriving more than ever before. According to a recent report from the UN Office on Drugs and Crime, 2013 saw opium production surge to record highs:

“The harvest this May resulted in 5,500 metric tons of opium, 49 percent higher than last year and more than the combined output of the rest of the world.”

Wow, that’s a lot of opium – and a lot of money being made. So, who is reaping the spoils?

***

How Opium Greed is Keeping US Troops in Afghanistan

Many people outright dismiss the notion of the CIA overseeing the trade of illegal drugs as crazy talk. However, history shows that it’s crazy not to entertain such a notion, especially during times of war profiteering.

In 2012, a Mexican government official from Juarez told Al Jazeera that the CIA and other international security forces “don’t fight drug traffickers” and that instead, the agency tries to “manage the drug trade.”

Back in the fifties, the CIA turned a blind eye to drug trafficking through the Golden Triangle while training Taiwanese troops against Communist China. As William Blum reports in Rogue State: 

“The CIA flew the drugs all over Southeast Asia, to sites where the opium was processed into heroin, and to trans-shipment points on the route to Western customers.”

These are far from isolated incidents. During the eighties, the CIA financially and logistically backed anti-communist contras in Nicaragua who also happened to be international drug traffickers.

Former Representative Ron Paul elaborated on the CIA’s notorious corruption when speaking to a group of students about Iran-Contra:

“[Drug trafficking] is a gold mine for people who want to raise money in the underground government in order to finance projects that they can’t get legitimately. It is very clear that the CIA has been very much involved with drug dealings. We saw [Iran-Contra] on television. They were hauling down weapons and drugs back.”

Surprisingly, mainstream publications still regard the Iran-Contra CIA drug trafficking scandal as a ‘conspiracy theory.’ I explain why it’s not on Breaking the Set:

***

Iran-Contra and the CIA’s Cocaine Trafficking

Circumstantial evidence aside, there is no conclusive proof that the CIA is physically running opium out of Afghanistan. However, it’s hard to believe that a region under full US military occupation – with guard posts and surveillance drones monitoring the mountains of Tora Bora – aren’t able to track supply routes of opium exported from the country’s various poppy farms (you know, the ones the US military are guarding).

In today’s globalized world of rule-for-profit, one can’t discount the role that multinational corporations play in US foreign policy decisions either. Not only have oil companies and private military contractors made a killing off the occupation, big pharmaceutical companies, which collectively lobby over 250 million dollars annually to Congress, need opium latex to manufacture drugs for this pill happy nation. As far as the political elite funneling the tainted funds, the recent HSBC bank scandal exposed how trillions of dollars in black market sales are brazenly being laundered offshore.

Multinational corporations are in it for the long haul, despite how low public support is for the war. A little mentioned strategic pact has already been signed that will allow a US troop presence to remain in Afghanistan until 2024.

The US’ goal of sustained warfare to oversee the world’s opium trade has been alleged by many, including foreign military officials. In 2009, a former commander in the Russian invasion of Afghanistan, General Mahmut Gareev, said to RT:

“Americans themselves admit that drugs are often transported out of Afghanistan on American planes. Drug trafficking in Afghanistan brings them about 50 billion dollars a year – which fully covers the expenses tied to keeping their troops there…[the US military doesn’t] have any planned military action to eliminate the [Taliban].” 

The unwinnable nature of the war becomes more apparent when learning that the US government was paying Taliban insurgents to protect supply routes and “switch sides” in an attempt to neutralize the insurgency. The logic of funding both sides of the war to “win” is too incomprehensible a concept to grasp. Clearly, this war is meant to be sustained.

Baseless rhetoric aside, here’s the hard, hypocritical truth: this government is fighting a multi-billion dollar ‘War on Drugs’ worldwide, resulting in thousands of deaths every year and millions of nonviolent drug users rotting away in prison. Yet, the US is at the very least protecting the largest source of the deadliest and most addictive drug on the planet. If not for the obvious, then why?

Written by Abby Martin for Media Roots 

Follow me @AbbyMartin

Photo by Flickr user Beggs, thanks to Sherwood Ross for the quotes

6 thoughts on “How Opium is Keeping US in Afghanistan: CIA’s Shady History of Drug Trafficking

  1. One who spends dirty money on good purposes is an exceptional philanthropist.He who spends good money on dirty purposes is an exceptional fool. CIA is neither . It spends dirty money for dirty purposes.

  2. I really don’t think that there are a significant amount of high ranking CIA personnel profiting from the Poppy cultivation market in Afghanistan. There may be some, but I don’t think it’s as far reaching as this reporter makes it seem. US pharma companies could not purchase opium raw materials, to manufacture narcotic/non-narcotic medication, from an unestablished source or vendor. I worked for a chemical company that made a lot of different products that went into a lot of different applications; non were pharma, but we certainly bought plenty of materials/chemicals that could be used to make drugs, bombs or chemical weapons. Anything being imported is always highly scrutinized; that’s both internal and external. The fact is that Afghanistan is a war torn country. It was like that before we got there, except the Taliban (which we can all agree really aren’t a great group of people) were in control of most of the tribal/rural areas of the country. They also harbored terrorists and terrorist “bases”. Something we also can all agree is bad. Now that we have succeeded bringing down the Taliban, killing Bin Laden, and breaking up many elements of a once centralized and more united Al Qaeda-The Extremist, militant Islamic terrorist organization responsible for atrocious crimes worldwide. Now the US has pulled the majority of its troops out, Afghanistan needs to be able to police itself. In order to do this, it needs money. It needs an economy. So the US is protecting the Afghan poppy plant production because it is a major source of revenue for the local polulation. This provides money needed to build infrastructure.This is nothing new. The US has always helped a countries with rebuilding their infrastructure after the United States conducted military operations in or was at war with said country. With Afghanistan, it’s a little trickier than Germany or Japan, the rural areas where most of the operations occurred barely had any infrastructure, it was all tribal communities. So until a more diversified economy and established enterprise can be developed; Poppy plant cultivation is a way that the native Afghan people in these tribal areas can make a living, build their infrastructure, increase their standard of living and ultimately build something that they are willing to unite for, to police, to protect and to try to bring new opportunities by creating relationships with other nations. I see nothing wrong with this. Poppy plants are necessary for a lot of legit businesses. A lot of it is going to the manufacturing of heroin, but at least it isn’t being controlled by cartels like the coca plant is in Peru. Also, that one remark about American Oil companies having something to gain in Afghanistan is complete garbage. The US doesn’t need anymore oil. We have plenty produced here, and plenty produced overseas; it’s the refining process that actually causes most of the price fluctuation, not the crude itself. We refine more oil than any other nation, we import more oil than any other nation, but we also EXPORT more gasoline & petroleum products than ANY OTHER NATION. So whoever says it’s “about getting oil” doesn’t understand the economics of petrochemicals.

  3. Pingback: How Opium is Keeping US in Afghanistan: CIA's Shady History of Drug Trafficking | Richard Presser's Blog

  4. This kind of activity has been going on for well over 200 years.The establishment of Hong Kong during the Victorian era is a testament to that.The corruption and deception in all facets is hard to ignore but apparently most ego based societies do because ignorance is bliss.

Leave a Reply

RELATED NEWS

  • Media Roots Radio: Schrödinger’s Super Patriot – The 2001 Anthrax Mystery Part 1
  • Abby Martin on the Gary Null Show
  • Loud & Clear: US Sanctions Suppress Journalist Pushing Back on ‘Corporate Tyranny’
  • US Sanctions Shut Down ‘The Empire Files’ with Abby Martin
  • ABBY'S VIEWS

  • Abby Martin Confronts Nancy Pelosi Over Pentagon Spending at COP26
  • Empire Files LIVE – Election Special with Abby Martin
  • Abby Martin: Abolish the Supreme Court!
  • Tech Censorship Helps Trump Campaign
  • Abby Martin Election Update: $10B Reality Show
  • GOP Sabotages Mail, Biden vs Trump Foreign Policy
  • Abby Martin Election Update: Trump Gets COVID
  • Abby Martin: Telling Our Own Stories, Cultivating Our Own Narratives
  • United States Of Distraction: Fighting The Fake News Invasion (2020)
  • Empire Files: Afghanistan War Exposed––An Imperial Conspiracy
  • Empire Files: The Forever War – From The Killing Fields
  • Media Roots Radio: Cartoon Fascism, The Lesser of Two Republican War Criminals
  • Media Roots Radio: Abby Sues Georgia in Historic Free Speech Lawsuit
  • Abby Martin Sues Georgia Over Israel Loyalty Oath Law [Full Press Conference & Interviews]
  • Abby Martin on Biden: The Sexist the Media Ignores