Dismantling Our Right-Wing World

Posted on by

(A quick note to US readers: left and right in this piece do not refer to the American liberal-conservative spectrum – both of which are considered neoliberal – but to the broader left-right spectrum as traditionally conceived, ranging from far-left communism/socialism to far-right fascism.)

zapatistas flickr aeneastudioIt’s been an eventful few weeks for the Zapatista Army of National Liberation (EZLN), also known as the Zapatistas, midway through their 20th anniversary year.

First, Jose Luis Solís López, also known as “Compañero Galeano”, was murdered by a paramilitary group with ties to the Mexican government, which also injured fifteen other Zapatistas and destroyed a school, clinic and water system in the same attack. The attack then prompted the Zapatistas to change strategies, with well-known spokesperson Subcomandante Marcos stepping down.

These developments serve to remind us of the EZLN’s status as, in the words of Chris Hedges, “the most important resistance movement of the last two decades” – important enough to warrant the rather violent attention of the Mexican government and its paramilitary associates.

The EZLN, a group based in the state of Chiapas in southern Mexico, launched an armed rebellion against the Mexican government on January 1, 1994 as an act of protest against the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which entered into effect on the same day. However, instead of attacking the Mexican state and society and causing endless bloodshed, the Zapatistas set up a system of self-governance in the territory it controlled, creating autonomous communities each with its own health clinic and schools to fill the void that the Mexican government had actively sought to widen in the interests of US and Canadian multinational corporations.

What the Zapatistas demonstrate is a vision of the notion articulated in the motto of the World Social Forum: another world is possible. They provide evidence that contradicts the belief that the status quo under neoliberal capitalism, in which the haves have it all and the have-nots are left to fend for themselves, is not only the best system but indeed the only viable system. The Zapatistas represent a victory for the oppressed peoples of the world over the powerful political and economic interests that rule over them. But more importantly, they represent a victory for the values of egalitarianism, compassion and solidarity – what I call the left-wing ethos. A victory over the idea that those who rule have the divine right to further their own interests, regardless of the consequences for the rest of humanity – an attitude that epitomizes what it means to be “right-wing”.

Marko Attila Hoare boils down the left-right spectrum to a simple distinction: that “the left supports the redistribution of wealth from the rich to the poor while the right opposes it”. But we can remove the entire spectrum from politics entirely to expose the values that underlie them: lefties value social equality, whereas righties value social hierarchy. Why, though? The answer lies in our individual worldview. As a self-identified lefty, I consider it more than possible for all of us to peacefully coexist in the world and have all of our common needs met, if (and only if) that’s the goal that we all work together to try to achieve. In a left-wing worldview, it’s therefore neither necessary nor ethical for us to undermine others in order to benefit ourselves. In other words: compassion, not competition. Without claiming complete objectivity, a right-wing worldview revolves around the idea that we live in a dog-eat-dog world in which the best we can do is fend for ourselves and get our share before someone else takes it.

Human history has been almost entirely dominated by the right-wing worldview. It’s been an endless cycle in which privileged groups have taken turns dominating each other in a seemingly eternal battle between the powerful and the powerless. From the imperial conquests of the ancient world through European colonialism, the two World Wars and Soviet communism to modern neoliberal capitalism, it’s always been the same story, flowing through different chapters but reaching the same inevitable conclusion: Oligarchy. It’s a story familiar to the Zapatistas as well as countless other sites of confrontation between the haves and the have-nots in recent years. The hierarchical, conflict-ridden relationship today between those who rule the world and those who are ruled, between corporate bosses and workers, between autocrats and their citizens, between the rich and the poor, is a continuation of this cycle of domination.

The right-wingers among us will assert that history simply reflects human nature, that it is in our nature to be maliciously selfish rather than compassionate, that this is the best we can do, or even that there’s nothing wrong with the world we’ve created. But their argument fails to acknowledge that the dominant worldview of the past has created the world we know today. As an example, the domination of the indigenous populations of the Americas, Africa, Asia and Oceania by European invaders and colonizers was not an inevitable result of human nature, but rather a product of widespread extreme right-wing beliefs such as Manifest Destiny and the white man’s burden. Similarly, the dominant worldview of the present will determine the world of tomorrow. A child raised in a society that values getting ahead at all costs is encouraged is far more likely to act accordingly than one raised in a society that values empathy and compassion. The dominant worldview in a society is therefore not inherent in human nature but in fact reinforces itself.

Right-wing theorists have a crucial role to play in promoting their worldview, too. “Realist” international relations scholars, capitalist economists, or simply those at the top of the social hierarchy love to tell us how it’s in our nature to always act in self-interest. They tell us that “greed is good” and that we all collectively benefit from constantly undermining each other, as ludicrous as that may sound. Yet, for the most part, even despite their contempt for those below them in the social hierarchy, even right-wingers behave in an incredibly left-wing manner towards those closest to them. And that’s because humans organized themselves into what we nowadays call “societies” precisely so that we could all benefit from being interdependent. That interdependence required us to develop compassion to allow us to survive in a society. The “savage” who undermines and betrays everyone he or she comes into contact with doesn’t survive for very long and, sociopaths aside, doesn’t find much happiness either. Surely we as a species are capable of applying that same logic to our everyday actions in today’s world so that we can all thrive at the same time instead of striving to be the “last man standing”?

Roman Krznaric couldn’t have put it any better: we need an empathy revolution. We need to turn the right-wing world that we live in into a left-wing one in which we recognize our fellow human beings as worthy of a livelihood and worthy of happiness and, in return, receive the same recognition. As the economic crisis in Greece goes to show, humans are capable of compassion even in the most desperate of situations: rather than stealing from each other, many Greeks are stepping in to provide the services that their government has failed to deliver and those that some of their compatriots can no longer afford, from food to medical services to street lighting – all for free. Similar systems have been devised in Serbia as well as in Macedonia, where numerous bakeries have introduced “solidarity baskets” to allow customers to buy an extra bun or piece of bread to leave to those who can’t afford to eat. And many customers indeed comply.

But showing empathy on our part only does half the job. While it spares those around us from our own potential malice, what it doesn’t do is liberate ourselves from those who have their hands around our necks. That involves critically examining and rethinking the false ideologies and pseudo-theories invoked by the powerful for the sole purposes of justifying their own dominating behaviour. After all, ideologies are all too often used as pretenses to mask the hidden agendas of those who assert them rather than a reflection of the values that they truly believe – in other words, purposeful bullshit. We mustn’t forget how the left-wing idea of communism was employed by self-described revolutionaries to justify right-wing oligarchic tyranny. Similarly, we can’t afford to look away when libertarians cite the dogma of enriching big businesses at the cost of everyone else, or when rich countries proclaim free trade to justify infiltrating the economies of developing countries. We’ve been raised to regard Soviet-style communism as tyranny and Western capitalism as freedom, but we need to recognize both for what they are: systems of oppression backed up by pseudo-theories that have no empirical basis and only serve those who preach them.

The empathy revolution needs a theoretical and social component. Neither pacifism nor confrontation can do the job alone. We need to channel our discontent into action by adopting the autonomist ethos of the Zapatistas to build the society we want. We need to form cooperatives and make use of cryptocurrencies, local currencies, open source, open knowledge, peer-to-peer practices, the sharing economy and countless other methods of grassroots social and economic organization the mainstream media doesn’t want us to hear a word about. What these methods all have in common is that they’re all built on the basis of cooperation and collaboration rather than malice and treachery – exactly what society needs and what the oligarchs don’t want.

Modern society is diseased and needs treatment. It’s only when we renounce one-upmanship in favour of cooperation and collaboration that we’ll be able to construct a society not for the few at the top, but for all of us. After all, isn’t fulfilling our mutual needs the whole point of even living in a society? It’ll require a good deal of empathy and creativity, as well as plenty of critical thinking to distinguish truth from pseudo-theory and other purposeful bullshit. Left-wing and right-wing are no longer a question of politics, but a question of social values and social justice. The right-wing worldview has failed us, and as the Zapatistas have shown, another world is certainly possible. It’s time to recognize that, for the purposes of redeeming ourselves from perpetual oligarchy, left is right.

Written by Ming Chun Tang, photo by flickr user aeneastudio

http://clearingtherubble.wordpress.com/

**

Jacobin Magazine’s Bhaskar Sunkara on Breaking the Set

How the Zapatistas’ Success Threatens Global Status Quo

5 thoughts on “Dismantling Our Right-Wing World

  1. I agree except for one thing. “As an example, the domination of the indigenous populations of the Americas, Africa, Asia and Oceania by European invaders and colonizers was not an inevitable result of human nature, but rather a product of widespread extreme right-wing beliefs such as Manifest Destiny and the white man’s burden.”

    It’s common to blame the World’s condition of inequality on Europeans and their incursions into other parts of the World. A student of ancient history knows that inequality, class hierarchy and overall social foulness existed in these regions long before ‘white men’ entered the equation.

    This is common mistake made by leftists around the World. They fail to acknowledge the right-wing elements within their own Societies and ethnic groups and like to lay the sin at the doorstep of Europe and North America.

    The Aztecs were conquering, ripping Peoples’ hearts out long before the Latins discovered them. India had an oppressive caste system before the British rolled up. Indonesia had 2 dozen words for slavery (most resulting from an Individual’s economic failure) long before the Dutch Bastards ever sailed into their waters. Do I have to continue? I can make a very long list of douchebags that don’t have pale skin or speak English.

    • LOL – I’m not sure that dismissing cruelty and disregard for the suffering and death of others as the work of douchebags is going to help us come to terms with human nature :)

    • Brilliant comment. Yes, there is a dark side to human nature. The famous Prison Experiment (early 70s) and the Milgram experiments of the 50s demonstrated this. Most Americans are so brainwashed into believing in this positive thinking nonsense that they refuse to see that we humans are a flawed species and any one of us is prone to corrupt leadership under certain circumstances.

      The women’s movement started in the 70s ’cause women felt disenfranchised by the male peace activists of the 60s. Some female activists were prevented from speaking and even asked to walk on the other side of the street while male activists got glory and media attention.

      When I met up w/ppl in Occupy, I saw something similar–not many poor people or black people or women in positions of power, at least not in my city.

      The closest to a solution to human frailty, I believe, is to always have checks and balances and accountability over power. We’re never going to have an utopian society but we could make life a lot better by limiting how much power any one person or group of people can attain over the rest of us.

  2. I agree except for one thing. “As an example, the domination of the indigenous populations of the Americas, Africa, Asia and Oceania by European invaders and colonizers was not an inevitable result of human nature, but rather a product of widespread extreme right-wing beliefs such as Manifest Destiny and the white man’s burden.”

    It’s common to blame the World’s condition of inequality on Europeans and their incursions into other parts of the World. A student of ancient history knows that inequality, class hierarchy and overall social foulness existed in these regions long before ‘white men’ entered the equation.

    This is common mistake made by leftists around the World. They fail to acknowledge the right-wing elements within their own Societies and ethnic groups and like to lay the sin at the doorstep of Europe and North America.

    • I totally agree with your comments, I too have been guilty of that error in the past. Those ‘right wing beliefs’ are merely one example of the kind of justification we have always used for our inhumanity. Also, dehumanization and genocide are by no means the product of hierarchical civilizations – they are basic to human nature and can be found in many traditional societies around the world throughout history. Some good examples can be found in Jared Diamond’s “The World Until Yesterday”.

Leave a Reply

RELATED NEWS

  • Media Roots Radio: Interview with Anoa Changa on Progressive Black Activists Targeted in New McCarthyism
  • The Joe Rogan Experience #1111 — Abby Martin
  • It’s Going Down: “They Are Their Own Gravediggers”: Abby Martin on War, Bannonism, Russia
  • Empire Files: What the Russian Revolution Proved Possible
  • ACTIVISM

  • Abby Martin Sues Georgia Over Israel Loyalty Oath Law [Full Press Conference & Interviews]
  • Mike Prysner Speech: No War on Iran! Troops Out of Iraq!
  • Media Roots Radio: Embassy Takeover, Latest Front of US War on Venezuela with Anya Parampil
  • Abby Martin Speaks Out Against Venezuela Coup
  • Office Hours with Tim Heidecker and Abby Martin
  • Vegan Vanguard Podcast: The Great March of Return and Palestinian Resistance with Abby Martin
  • Abby Martin at Project Censored’s 2018 Media Freedom Summit 2.0
  • Abby Martin on the Gary Null Show
  • Project Censored: Abby Martin, Mike Prysner, and Kevin Gosztola
  • Media Roots Radio: Trump Dogwhistles QAnon, Russia Censorship Redux, Hijacking Free Speech
  • Media Roots Radio: Interview w/ Barrett Brown on the Pursuance Project
  • Media Roots Radio Interview with Kyle Kulinksi on New Atheism, DNC Implosion, Charlatan Trump
  • Media Roots Radio: World Blind to Israeli Massacre of Protesters, Attack of the Smears, Venezuela Hypocrisy
  • acTVism Munich: Interview with Abby Martin – Corporate Media, Imperialism & People Power
  • Media Roots Radio: Interview with Anoa Changa on Progressive Black Activists Targeted in New McCarthyism