CENTER FOR NATIONAL POLICY– Echoing recent statements by congressional Democrats, conservative counterterrorism experts Wednesday said the United States is “less safe” today than before Sept. 11, 2001. But White House Press Secretary Tony Snow continued to defend President Bush’s position that the U.S. is safer now than before the worst terrorist attacks in the nation’s history.

The National Intelligence Estimate, which reportedly concluded that the Iraq war has heightened Islamic radicalism and increased the threat of terrorism, was leaked Sunday. The report has been cited by many Democrats in their criticisms of the Bush administration’s handling of the war.

“We’ve heard a lot in the last 48 hours about the National Intelligence Estimate conclusion that U.S. presence overseas in the war in Iraq has contributed to jihadi fightings,” said Col. Michael Meese, head of the department of social sciences at West Point Military Academy. “In fact, that is what we found.”

“We’ve done a lot to look at the root causes of terrorism,” Meese said at the Heritage Foundation in Washington, D.C. From looking at “online jihadi writings, thus far, direct engagement with the United States has been good for the jihadi movement.”

He noted that the conflict drains American resources and puts pressure on American allies.

“The United States should avoid direct large-scale military action in the Middle East,” he said.

Scott Bates, vice president of the Center for National Policy, told Cybercast News Service, “I think we’re less safe [than before 9/11]. I think we’re creating more terrorists than we are capturing or killing.

“You have to turn off the faucet before you can mop up the floor,” he added. “I hate to say it, but that faucet is going full blast right now. We have to turn off that faucet.”

Bates said wining the war on terrorism requires targeting and attacking terrorists, providing a strong domestic defense system and preventing the rise of future terrorists. He said the U.S. will have to “commit equal vigor and resources in all those areas at the same time to truly prevail in this long war.”

But White House Press Secretary Tony Snow Wednesday defended the President Bush’s assertion that the United States is winning the war on terror and that the U.S. homeland is safer now than before 9/11.

“Since September 11, 2001, we have not been attacked. And, furthermore, the United States, since September 11, 2001, has taken a much more aggressive approach toward terror than it had taken previously,” Snow said during his daily briefing.

Intelligence failures of the past, he said, are finally being remedied.

“Even with the buildup since September 11th, we are only now beginning to achieve the same sort of levels that we had, in terms of intelligence assets that we had at the beginning of the Clinton administration,” Snow added.

Al Qaeda and other terrorist organizations have been weakened in the last five years and can no longer communicate easily or maintain centralized operations, he said. “They had an operational capability then that they do not have now.”

© CENTER FOR NATIONAL POLICY, 2007

Photo by Abby Martin

TIMES OF INDIA– The United States is lining up billions of dollars in new economic and military aid to Pakistan despite reports that Islamabad is using American tax-payer money for deals with the Taliban and accounts of US arms ending up in the hands of the extremists.

Amid an ongoing review of the so-called Af-Pak policy initiated by the Obama administration, Washington, under pressure from influential Senator John Kerry among other lawmakers and lobbyists, is said to be considering a one-time $ 5 billion aid to Pakistan over and above the $ 1.5 billion annual package for ten years currently under review for passage through Congress.

Releasing a report by the think-tank Atlantic Council on Wednesday, Kerry, who is also the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and is in a position to pilot the aid package, raised the prospect of a total collapse in Pakistan if it was not helped urgently.

“If we fail, we face a truly frightening prospect: terrorist sanctuary, economic meltdown, and spiraling radicalism, all in a nation with 170 million inhabitants and a full arsenal of nuclear weapons,” he said. “The stakes could not be higher, and [this] report could not be more timely.”

The 27-page report calls for “a total of $4-5 billion above the (Biden)-Kerry-Lugar proposals and beyond the IMF and other loans from the US. and other sources,” for Pakistan. Of this, it recommends, about $3 billion should go to the economic and social sectors directly. About $1 billion of fresh or redirected funds would go to security forces — both military and law enforcement.

US government reports in recent times have detailed how Pakistan has misused billions in aid for a military build-up against India instead of using it for the intended war on terror. Audits have also detailed million of dollars in fraudulent claims by the Pakistani military. Reimbursement to Pakistan have been halted for several minths because of this but are set to resume soon after the Obama administration has given a green signal pending further audits.

Continue reading about the US Pledging Billions to Pakistan.

Photo by Flickr user Vibracobra23

© TIMES OF INDIA, 2009