Andy Roth of Project Censored at SFSU

March 16, 2012

MEDIA ROOTS Andy Roth, Associate Director of Project Censored, recently spoke about breaking through the corporate propaganda model at San Francisco State University on for the ‘Media Literacy: Corporate Propaganda & Advocating Independent Journalism’ Project Censored event.

***

Andy Roth, Associate Director, Project Censored at SFSU

***

Messina

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Reply

Media Roots TV – Mickey Huff: Diary of a Scapegoat

March 17, 2012

MEDIA ROOTS “And the diary of this story is to try to reclaim the vernacular narrative and try to change this phenomenon right now.  This is our time while we’re here in this time-space continuum.  And we have an obligation to our children and people before that are not here yet to rectify these situations.  And that’s what this show is about.” —Mickey Huff

Mickey Huff, Director of Project Censored, and co-host of KPFA Radio’s The Morning Mix with Project Censored, gave a speech entitled ‘Diary of a Scapegoat’ at Oaktown Indie Mayhem (OIM): Diary of a Scapegoat Art Show on .

Messina

***

Mickey Huff, Director, at Project Censored; Diary of a Scapegoat at Oakland Indie Mayhem.

***

Michael Levitin, Editor, OccupiedWSJournal at SFSU

MEDIA ROOTS — Michael Levitin, Editor of The Occupied Wall Street Journal, speaks at San Francisco State University about the Occupy Wall Street Movement and occupying the media at the ‘Media Literacy: Corporate Propaganda & Advocating Independent Journalism’ Project Censored event on March 13, 2012.

***

Michael Levitin, Editor of the Occupied Wall Street Journal, at SFSU

***

MR Transcript: Project Censored on Flashpoints

March 16, 2012

MHuffMEDIA ROOTS Earlier this week, Pacifica Radio’s Flashpoints spoke with Project Censored Director, Mickey Huff to discuss various topics addressed in the new Project Censored 2012 Sourcebook.

Messina

***

FLASHPOINTS — “You’re listening to Flashpoints on Pacifica Radio.  My name is Dennis Bernstein. 

“We are joined by Project Censored Director Mickey Huff.  There’s going to be an event held by Project Censored tomorrow at the Arlene Francis Center in Santa Rosa.  Mickey Huff, welcome back to Flashpoints.”

Mickey Huff (c. 52:02):  “Dennis, thanks so much for having us back.  We appreciate it.”

Dennis Bernstein:  “Well, it’s good to have you with us.  Why don’t you take a minute or two to talk about, I don’t know, what’s the latest corporate media outrage that’s on your mind?  I know that there’s a lot, a big selection.” 

Mickey Huff:  “Yeah. [Laughs]  Yeah, to have a few minutes for that.  I mean, gee, it’s overwhelming.  I mean just the reporting that’s been going on over the weekend concerning the alleged lone gunman.  And, certainly, you’ve covered that and some other people at KPFA and some independent media have been covering this.  And it’s always the case that it’s some lone gunmen and it’s one tragic disaster.  And it has nothing to do with the overall architecture of empire.  And the dots are never connected.  In terms of that type of framing and issues of censorship in the Obama Administration’s War on Whistleblowers and Journalists, it connects, at least in our minds at Project Censored, to Obama’s role in continuing the imprisonment of Abdulelah Haider Shaye in Yemen, who also revealed the significant involvement of the U.S. in the slaughter of civilians there that they later claimed to be militants.  He went and uncovered that material.  Jeremy Scahill has reported that.  Glenn Greenwald’s reported that.  The corporate media is completely silent on those types of things. 

“And, again, it also helps hide to the public the fact that these are not bad apples; these are not lone instances; these are not exceptions to the ruleHow many exceptions need to happen before it becomes the rule?  These are war atrocities.  War is terrorism.  And the media—the corporate media—in this country is complicit in, not only covering it up, but cheerleading it along the way.”

Dennis Bernstein (c. 53:48):  “I noted with Kathy Kelly, at the beginning of the show, that the mainstream media was saying there’s not nearly the response to this slaughter as there was, for instance, to the burning of the Quran.  But then we learn the so-called independent media supported by the U.S. government, was warned, ‘Shut it down or you’re gonna be punished.’  Sound familiar?”

Mickey Huff (c. 54:12):  “Yeah, it’s kind of amazing the collusion between government and these media organisations.  I mean, again, it’s easily, if anybody bothers to read the First Amendment they can see where there’s some problems here.  But the problem, really, goes further.  Again, the problem isn’t that just simply that these are horrible things that are happening.  These are things as you’ve mentioned earlier in the programme are things that come here at home in terms of the paramilitarisation of police against the Occupy Movement; H.R. 347, the new law that will basically criminalise dissent even if people are unaware that they are in an area that is a so-called restricted zone.  This is a continuation of the free speech pens under the Bush era. 

“And the thing that’s quite alarming is both in the corporate media and even among liberals, why is this okay when Obama does it?  Can one imagine the outcry in the streets if there was a Bush president and these types of things were going on?  I mean you would have a serious mobilisation of many people that are liberal.  Certainly, the peace movement is still somewhat active in some of these movements. 

“But because it’s an election year, there’s a serious tendency for people to say, well, there’s nobody else, but Obama.  We certainly can’t withstand a Santorum; or a Gingrich; or a Jeb Bush, dark horse out of the blue; or what have you.

“But, again, these people are turning a blind eye to, not again, not just these kinds of atrocities are being committed in Afghanistan and Iraq and Yemen and Syria and Libya.  But they’re acting as if, again, Obama is somehow different.  He has actually continued the trajectory of the Bush wars and attacks.  He has continued the illegality of them.  He has made real assassination strikes against U.S. citizens and drone attacks.  And he continues to be the worst president on record for attacking whistleblowers.”

Dennis Bernstein:  “Alright.  Let me jump in here, Mickey ‘cos I want to tell people what’s goin’ on. We’re speaking with Mickey Huff.  He is Project Censored’s Director.  They have an incredible new yearbook, Censored 2012 Sourcebook for the Media Revolution.  In Santa Rosa, there’s gonna be an event tomorrow night, there’s a reception 6-7pm, doors open from 7-9pm, at the Arlene Francis Center, 99 Sixth Street, Santa Rosa. 

“And if people want more information about what’s gonna happen, how do they get that, Mickey?”

Mickey Huff (c. 56:35):  “ProjectCensored.org is our website.  The event tomorrow:  Dispatches from the Media Revolution Project Censored 2012.  Again, food and refreshments, 6-7pm.  Arlene Francis Center for Spirit, Art, and Politics, a wonderful space in Santa Rosa in the North Bay.

“We’ll be hearing from Michael Levitin of the Occupy Wall Street Journal.  Nora Barrows Friedman, Electronic Intifada, also formerly with Flashpoints.  We’re delighted that you’ll be there to talk about your new book, Dennis.  Abby Martin of Media Roots.  Associate Director, Andy Roth.  Peter PhillipsCarol Brouillet, long-time activist in the South Bay.  Paul Ray, 9/11 researcher.  Again, we’ll have many, many different people.  And we’d love to come out and meet everybody.  And talk to students and professors about the research we’ve done on the 2012 book.  And also foreshadow what’s going on for the near future.”

Dennis Bernstein (c. 57:18):  “And we want to let people know that if they can’t make it.  They can check it out on NoLiesRadio.org, right?”

Mickey Huff:  “That’s correct.  Allan Rees will be streaming the show live.  And we invite people to watch and to, again, make comments, stream, and, of course, if anybody has stories that they’re interested in seeing; get more of a voice and a megaphone because they are not being covered, whether it’s at Pacifica or any other media outlet, please nominate stories at ProjectCensored.org.”

Dennis Bernstein:  “Alright.  Mickey Huff, Director of Project Censored.  Hoping to see you tomorrow night at the Arlene Francis Center.  Starting at six o’clock for the reception.  Thanks, Mickey. 

Mickey Huff:  “Thanks so much, Dennis.  We appreciate being on.”

Transcript by Felipe Messina for Media Roots, Flashpoints, and Project Censored

***

Economist Dr. Alain Parquez at Italian MMT Summit 2012

Lebanon by conjure1 flickrMEDIA ROOTS — Recently, Max Keiser discussed, on RT, the MF Global pillaging scandal, the USA’s eighth largest bankruptcy, and how the Occupy Movement has remained largely silent on the potential rallying-call issue due to a lack of financial literacy.  Fortunately, Max Keiser, Dr. Michael Hudson, Dr. Richard Wolff, and others have been speaking at Occupy Movement convergences.  Perhaps, in the USA, we may learn to head off the banker fascism austerity now looming over the Eurozone.  Media Roots considers the benefits of our increased collective interest in the dynamics of political economy and international relations, impacting our global regions.  In this spirit, we present the second broadcast from Pacifica Radio’s Guns and Butter, featuring excerpts of the introductory remarks from radical economist Dr. Alain Parquez at the recent Italian Modern Monetary Theory Summit in Rimini, Italy, February 2012.

Messina

***

GUNS AND BUTTER Real wages will collapse.  And what we have in mind is a total collapse of the share of labour income in the French society and how to get that by the Treaty of Maastricht and the creation of the euro system.”  — Dr. Alain Parquez

“I’m Bonnie Faulkner.  Today on Guns and Butter:  Alain Parquez.  Today’s show:  The Birth of the European Central Bank: Its Real Agenda.  Alain Parquez is Emeritus Professor of Economics, Ist Class, Université de Franche-Comte at Besancon, France; Faculty of Law, Economics and Political Science.  He has written extensively on monetary policy, crisis theory, and economic policy, including articles and books on the impact of austerity measures, which he believes are the cause of the world crisis.  He is currently writing a book on the general theory of the monetary circuit and its economic policy implications. 

“Today’s show features introductory remarks by Alain Parquez at the first Italian grassroots economic Summit on Modern Money Theory in Rimini, Italy, February 2012, produced by Italian journalist Paolo Barnard.  The five speakers were Stephanie Kelton, William Black, Alain Parquez, Michael Hudson, and Marshall Auerback.”

Dr. Alain Parquez (c. 2:00):  “Yes, when I look at this audience, I am ashamed to be French because such an event would be impossible in my own country for two reasons.  The government would have tried to forbid it.  And the economy and society is in such a state of total disaster that people, even young people, are completely despaired.  So, again, Italians are the sole hope of Europe. [Applause]

Contrary to what happens in France, you try to fight the total coup d’état which has been planned a very long time ago, and enshrined into the European monetary union.  I shall try to explain that the so-called ‘sovereign crisis’ of sovereign debt is a lie. [Applause]  But it has been carefully planned by those who build the European system.  What they had in mind was the creation of a new totalitarian social order destroying democracy, all kind of social legislation.  And now the new treaty imposed by our French president, who makes Berlusconi a saint, deprived the states of any kind of sovereignty, imposed permanent deflation.  So, yes, my colleague was right [reaching over to UMKC Professor W.K. Black, seated to his left].  You are what the European ruling-class is afraid ofmobilisation of the people.  They want to rule by fear and ignorance.  And, at least, thanks to Paolo and thanks to you, there is hope that fear and ignorance will defeat what should be deemed techno-fascism, which is the existing tradition of the European monetary union.  So, thank you and hail Italy. [Applause]

(c. 6:23) “Well, I am here to speak of a very dark and tragic story.  You already understood that the euro is a monster, contradicting all the rules of both modern money, modern economy.  So, the problem is why is such an absurd system exists at all.  I was told that in your country, like in mine, some people believe that if we get rid of the euro, Italy or France should be back to the state of the poorest part of Africa—Zimbabwe.  But the real economy in the Eurozone is already in the state of Zimbabwe.  For instance, some short data on France because the French invented and imposed the Eurosystem a very long time ago.   In France, the true amount of unemployment is around 60% of the active people, which is obviously enormous.  And we have a true rate of inflation of 7% or 8%.  So, we don’t have full employment and we don’t have price stability.  It means that all official data in Europe are lies.

(c. 9:38) “So, I shall start my true speech by a quotation from the Chief Executive of the French Ministry of Finance—by the way, is a monk of the Order of Santo Benedict and the Chief of the French Opus Dei; and by the way the European Commission is entirely controlled, like the French government, by the Opus Dei.  So, I try to discuss with him.  He told me, ‘Yes!  The French economy is dead, but not enough.’  He told me, ‘Professor, you should understand why the European system exists. What we want is to destroy, forever, the people. We want, forever, to create a new kind of European people, accepting sufferance, poverty, which could accept wages lower than in China. And it will be the core of my intervention.’

(c. 11:50) “The Eurosystem was never planned to be a monetary union.  It was not even planned as a neoliberal agenda.  The neoliberal economics, American style, was and is still completely ignored by the ruling European elite.  What you think that even for the leader of the French Socialist Party, President Obama is a Marxist.

“So, what is the euro?  A new totalitarian social order, which was planned a long time ago in the interwar period and completed by the regime of François MitterrandIn the new order, there will be no more sovereign state.  The state has to vanish, at least the state rooted into democracy, parliament, republic.  In the new order, power should be entirely transferred to those who deserve it, which means some elite capitalist class technocrats enjoying absolute power of control.”

Bonnie Faulkner (c. 14:49):  “You’re listening to economics professor and author Alain Parguez at the Summit on Modern Money Theory in Rimini, Italy.  Today’s show:  The Birth of the European Central Bank: Its Real Agenda.  I’m Bonnie Faulkner.  This is Guns and Butter.”

Dr. Alain Parquez:  “And, in the first part of my interventions, I shall try briefly to explain the story of the planning of the European monetary union. It started in the interwar period in the most reactionary, traditionalist, part of the French ruling-class with some support from an Italian philosopher, Julius Evola, the very one who accused Mussolini of being too soft to the people and who accused Adolf Hitler of being too soft on poor people. 

“In a second part, I shall try to explain that the so-called sovereign debt crisis is obviously an event who never happened in historyBut such a crisis has been carefully planned by the architects of the European system.  What they had in mind was to privatise the state.  And since they believed that the state, at least the state with democracy was always wasting real wealth.  It’s obvious that the state being forced to borrow money, the state debt should be looked at as bad debts and, thereby, the state should be completely enslaved to the so-called bonds market, which is exactly what is happening now.

(c. 18:37) “In [the] last part, I shall try to prove that there is not the least way of amending the system because as a social order it has its logic.  And those who control the system will never accept any kind of change, especially, any kind of intervention of the European Central Bank.  Only, indeed, if those interventions aim at increasing the banks’ wealth.  So, the sole possibility of saving the European society is to get rid of that system.  The private sector, capitalist sector, in Europe is now dead.  To quote Michael Hudson, ‘[few public] leaders of the capitalist sector are no more interested into the real economy. They are rentiers.’  So, European capitalism is dying. [Gross Domestic Product] is for five or six years, in France, minus 3% or 4% a year.

(c. 21:12) “As for the euro, it’s as I wrote, thanks to an invitation by my colleague Stephanie Kelton, a long time ago, on false money, I wrote an articleFalse Money Against the Real Economy.’  And, indeed, it destroyed the real economy.  But first let us, briefly, explain the origin of such an absurd system.  There are two stages into the planning of the Eurosystem.  The first in the interwar period and during 1940-1943.  And the second stage, the achievement of the system was, I must say, the masterwork of the regime of François Mitterrand.  So, we start in the mid-‘30s with people like Schuman, Jean Monnet.  Schuman wrote that in 1927 we need to create Europe as a new order rooted into tradition saving Europe from decadence.  Decadence for the poor Europeans means socialism, revolution, Protestants, Jews, Marxism, free access to health and education, abortions, homosexuality, etcetera, etcetera.

(c. 24:19) “And which is extremely interesting, for the early poor Europeans, what they wished was a system completely opposed to the United States society they hated.  And the European elite was more hating the United States society of consumption, shopping malls, than they hated USSR.  And now it is exactly the same.  So, what was required to build Europe, to abolish the state, to force a permanent deflation by squeezing and squeezing public expenditures.  It could help to transfer the power to a super-class of technocrats on a supranational scale.  But for those early Europeans, what meaned Europe?  It mean a condominium between France/Germany and a colonial empire, including Southern Europe and Eastern Europe.  They were absolutely explicit on this problem. 

“But how could we suppress the state?  By depriving the State of any power on money.  All of them were fanatical followers of Friedrich Hayek, the most right-wing Austrian economist of that time.  So, Europe should rely on a supranational currency, entirely controlled by a sovereign central bank enjoying absolute power to ration the state.  Indeed, there, finally, what they wished was to impose a future European currency, as a super-gold standard—”

Bonnie Faulkner (c. 28:35): “You’re listening to economics professor and author Alain Parguez at the Summit on Modern Money Theory in Rimini, Italy.  Today’s show:  The Birth of the European Central Bank: Its Real Agenda.  I’m Bonnie Faulkner.  This is Guns and Butter.”

Dr. Alain Parquez:  “—of the Treaty of Maastricht, was written by a French economist François Perroux in 1943 with the full support of a treaty passed between the [white] government and the French [Ponant] regime of that time.  And the new treaty, which has been decided by President Sarkozy and Madame Merkel, is exactly the blueprint of François Perroux 1943. 

“Those people were against the traditional gold standard because they believed that the gold standard had not allowed a total abolition of the power of the state to spend.  So, Europe should be a super-gold standard.  So, it was a first stage.  But, for some time, the European project was maybe in the backwards because all of his supporters were more Hitlerian than Adolf Hitler himself. 

“So, we had to wait.  The regime of Francois Mitterrand, I could speak on this question because I had been conscripted by the Chief Advisor of Francois Mitterrand, who by the way was a fanatical right-winger hating the modern world, hating the United States, a monarchist, who said, ‘I hate the poor.  So, Jacques Attali was, de facto, the Prime Minister of France.  And Attali was in charge with a lot of former Marxists, turned to supporters of the new regime, of drafting a more sustainable version of the Eurosystem.  But they had in mind the same vision:  We must destroy shopping malls, consumption.  Shopping malls were, for them, a pure infamy.  People should accept to be poor. 

(c. 33:18) “I remember debates at the secret commission who was in charge of the campaign of Mitterrand.  Mitterrand had to win the support of the then-Parti Communiste.  France had a communist party; now, no more.  So, I was charged to write some modest [condition]; I would say modern money programme.  But Attali was asked by those who funded [the] Mitterrand campaign.  And who [were] the major funders?  The Chase Manhattan Bank and two other American banks.  But we never gave you money to get a programme of full employment.  Attali said, I have the commitment of our dear future president, as soon as we could, we will destroy, we will cut, we will deflate the economy. Real wages will collapse. And what we have in mind is a total collapse of the share of labour income in the French society.  And how to get that?  By the Treaty of Maastricht and the creation of the Eurosystem.

“I shall end this intervention by emphasising, first, the lies.  It happened that I was quiet close to Francois Mitterrand.  He was some long time ago, some boyfriend of my mother before the war.  My mother told me, Francois lies so well that he could believe that he is for the people.  So, Francois Mitterrand during the sole debate on the Treaty of Maastricht dared to say, answering a question from a student, I can swear there is not the least independent central bank in the Treaty of Maastricht

(c. 37:28) “The second point.  The core principle of the European treaties was the privatisation of the state, was to oblige the state to borrow money by selling bonds to private banks.  So, the state, like any corporation, but a corporation with a very pure reputation had to beg money to banks at the rates of interest decreed by banks.  So, finally, the Treaty of Maastricht and the following Growth and Stability Pact, a very weird name.  The true name should have been Destruction and Instability PactSo, the true world they had in mind was that, finally, the State will be completely enslaved to private banks.  And, so, will be obliged to cut and cut and cut expenditures.  And it is exactly what happened.  And, finally, lies continue.  To be brief, the share of state debt in the assets of major French/German banks is below 5%.  Banks are losing money, not because of state debt, but because of the total collapse of the real economy.

(c. 40:50) “And, second point, I am horrified when people say, Oh, poor banks.  The Greek government lied.  But it is absurd; everybody was aware of the true state of the Greek economy.  90% of the Greek debt is held, like the Italian, by French and German banks.  So, everybody knew.  And, by the way, what is happening now sought to the new treaty is—if it is, indeed, finally endorsed—a total abdication of states, of fiscal policy, and any kind of social policy.  And, indeed, the dream of the new order will be achieved. 

“So, now, the problem of rulers of the system is how to maintain the control of society; of this, they are afraid because there is no debate.  Official economists in Germany, France, most European countries, are completely corrupt.  If I dare say, they are official prostitutes financed by grants of institutions; so, they never debate the infamy and collapse of European system.  Thank you. [Applause]”

Bonnie Faulkner (c. 43:47):  “You’re listening to Economics Professor and author Alain Parguez at the Summit on Modern Money Theory in Rimini, Italy.  Today’s show:  The Birth of the European Central Bank: Its Real Agenda.  I’m Bonnie Faulkner.  This is Guns and Butter.”

Dr. Alain Parquez (c. 44:08):  “You see, let me allow, for a while, [to differentiate] the European Central Bank and banks because, ultimately, who has created the ECB?  Who is imposing the European Central Bank policy? The states themselves.  Even if the European Central Bank decided to finance state expenditures, the French Government and the German Government will say no.  They absolutely are rejecting any kind of policy of saving the economy.  Everybody knows that.

(c. 45:14) “First, the European Central Bank is a weak oligarchy of 17 central banks de facto ruled by the French Central Bank and by the German Central Bank.  But everybody also knows that the central banks of France and Germany never do anything without the full advice, consent, and support of the new axis ruling in Europe—Paris/Berlin.  Thereby, it is exactly the same for banks; governments from France and Germany imposed policies of detritions all over Europe.  And now the economy is in such a state of disaster that we need an enormous increase in expenditures.  So, it is much more than a job guarantee programme when the majority of the population is forever unemployed.  So, my solution is let us support any movement to get rid of the euro.  There is no other way.  Give back full monetary sovereignty to the states. [Applause]

(c. 47:25) “I was told that this event is for the Chair of European Commission, an abomination; and your prime minister was asked to prevent it.  At least, the luck for Italy is that you have a weak state, whereas in France we have a very strong state.

“Second point, I do think that what is at stake is to impose a change of politics, people accepting—as learned audience—are living in a world of lies.  And you are absolutely right; the share of labour income, including pensions in France/Germany is at its lowest level since the interwar period or the Nazi period.  In France, in the span of 20 years, the share of labour income collapsed by at least 30% or 40% percent.  And, yes, more and more people are committing suicide in France because of labour conditions.  People who are still employed are living in firms who are more and more acting as some kind of Soviet forced-labour concentration [camp].  Never have people been so productive.  The productivity in France/Germany [and] is in Italy, one of the highest in the world.  But, at the same time, real wages collapsed and people are not aware of this scandal. 

“But now, in most parts of France, the shopping malls are empty.  A large part of the country is going back to some kind of middle age, an [item] for Germany.  And this is a scandal, [of which] we must try to make the people know the truth, to oblige the media to reveal the true situation.  Everybody knows that the euro is grossly over-and-over-valued.  The euro rate of exchange is maintained by a lot of artefacts, including permanent swaps with the Federal Reserve System

(c. 51:49) “And now, some thought of France and Germany to get an inflow of dollars from Saudi Arabia and even China.  So, the real value of the euro is absolutely nothing.  After all, Italy, like France, always survived and prospered in a global environment.  Without the euro, Italy was a highly competitive country, as Marshall [Auerback] said.  And, so, if I could assure you that Stephanie [Kelton] was right, the euro can’t survive, only if Italy decides to remain in the system.  All major banks in France and Germany are already trying to compute the effect of the end of the euro system.  It is a dying system.  So, the effect could be a benefit for Italy if it retains its monetary sovereignty, reconstruct the economy.

(c. 54:08) “The very option of the United States of Europe had been rejected since the start because those who intended to abolish the state at the national level did not intend to create a state at the European level.  We’ve reached a state of the society where the sole option is to leave the system.  And, by the way, banks do not want to be reimbursed.  It is a point I should address more.  The French and the Germans created a system, installing some kind of eternal debt for European people.  What banks want is income.  And if Italy decided to leave the Euro, the system would collapseThe real value of the euro is nothing.  And it is a fact that France and Germany, and mainly the French, are afraid of this point.”

Bonnie Faulkner (c. 55:55):  “You’ve been listening to Economics Professor and author Alain Parquez.  Today’s show has been:  The Birth of the European Central Bank: Its Real Agenda.  Alain Parquez is Emeritus Professor of Economics Ist Class, Université de Franche-Comté at Besancon (France); Faculty of Law, Economics and Political Science.  His main academic title is that of Docteur d’Etat Es Sciences Economiques, Université de Paris 1.  He is a member of the Eastern Economic Association in the United States.  Courses he has taught during the last eight years include, Principles of Macroeconomics, Theory of Economic Policy, Financial Economy, International Economic Relations, and Theory of Distribution.  Visit his website at www.neties.com.  Or google:  Alain Parquez.  Visit the website for the first Italian Summit on Modern Money Theory at www.DemocraziaMMT.info.

“Guns & Butter is produced by Bonnie Faulkner and Yara Mako.  To leave comments or order copies of shows, email us at [email protected].  Visit our website at www.gunsandbutter.org.”

Transcript by Felipe Messina for Media Roots and Pacifica Radio’s Guns and Butter

fm: Updated 22 MAR 2013 20:57 CST

***

Guns and Butter – March 14, 2012 at 1:00pm

Click to listen (or download)

Photo by Flickr user Conjure 1

Photo by Flickr user Christina Kekka (feature)