MR Original – Chevron Pranked by the Yes Men

MEDIA ROOTS- For those unfamiliar with the Yes Men, they are a group of brilliant and bold activists that aim to draw public attention to corporate crimes and wrongdoings by impersonating corporate figures before the media. The Yes Men target corporations that have escaped accountability for their crimes committed in the pursuit of profit above all else.

One Yes Men’s most successful hoaxes involved Dow Chemical. An activist posing as a PR representative of Dow to claim responsibility for the Bhopal tragedy, live on BBC World Television. Dow was the Yes Men target as the purchaser of the Union Carbide Corporation, which was responsible for the gas leak in Bhopal that killed approximately 15,000 people in 1984. For this prank, the faux PR rep claimed full responsibility for the tragedy, issued an apology and promised to compensate the victims and clean up the site. (To learn more about this prank– video here– and the history of their organization watch their documentary Yes Men Save The World.)

Now, the Yes Men have done it again! This time the victim of their hoax is Chevron.

In the wee-hours of this morning, when Chevron could not be contacted for verification, the Yes Men fired off a press release announcing their new ad campaign. The press release was flawless, matching exactly the real Chevron website, only making a slight change to the actual URL.

The ad campaign, “We Agree” is described in the release as Chevron’s attempt to make a “clean break from the past by taking direct responsibility for our own actions” through candid ads that feature “real people on the receiving end of Chevron controversies in Ecuador, Nigeria, the U.S. Gulf Coast and elsewhere.”

The hoax campaign has three ads. The first says in large capital letters- “OIL COMPANIES SHOULD CLEAN UP THEIR MESSES,” with a red “WE AGREE” stamp below and the signatures of Rex Northen, Chevron’s Executive Director, and Desmond King, the company’s President. The accompanying photo is of an older Latin American man with a red bandana around his neck and a simple, hand-made structure in the background.

Another ad shows a man standing in a river of oil, surrounded by open barrels, with the words “OIL COMPANIES SHOULD FIX THE PROBLEMS THEY CREATE.” Each ad, like the first, holds the signatures of Northen and King over the red “WE AGREE” stamp.

The last ad has a young Latin American girl standing in front of an oil barrel. The claim this time is that “OIL COMPANIES SHOULD PUT SAFETY FIRST.”

The ads were meant to reference an on-going lawsuit in Ecuador where Chevron is accused of negligence that amounts to $27 billion in oil pollution clean-up costs. Chevron deems this a “meritless case” and, according to the Christian Science Monitor, took out quarter page newspaper ads with headlines such as, “the fraud of the century”.

Hardly.

The real “We Agree” ad campaign makes less controversial claims that are ambiguous to the critical mind familiar with Chevron. These include, “Oil Companies Should Put Their Profits To Good Use,” “Oil Companies Need To Get Real” and “Oil Companies Should Support the Communities They’re A Part of.”

Chevron issued a press release in response to the hoax. In a quote that is telling of the politics that allow multinationals to operate with impunity, Hewitt Pate, the General Council for Chevron, said, “Despite what some will say, we are not obliged to abide by decisions that Ecuadorian judges make or do not make. This is because we have binding agreements with the Ecuadorian Government exempting us from any liabilities whatsoever, granted in exchange for a $40 million cleanup of some wells by Texaco in the 1990s.”

The press release also had similar commentary from Rhonda Zygocki, Chevron’s VP of Policy, Government and Public Affairs, who said, “This hoax is part of an ongoing effort to blame Chevron for 16 billion gallons of crude oil spilled in the Amazon during drilling operations. This blame game continues despite Chevron’s long-standing agreement with the Ecuadorian government which very obviously puts the issue behind us.”

Perhaps the best thing about the Yes Men is how they force the corporations to respond to the accusations before them. The hoax first reveals to the public the unresolved human and environmental suffering caused by the guilty corporation. Unable to deny the spill of 16 billion gallons of crude oil (or the disaster at Bhopal), the corporate executives show the public how they really operate. As we see in the quotes above, there is no denial of what happened in Ecuador as a result of Chevron’s business. Instead, Zygocki and Pate are defending Chevron’s refusal to take accountability for the tragedy they caused, citing the (unfortunate) agreement made with the Ecuadorian government.

What the Chevron executives are saying is that the problem belongs to the innocent people of Ecuador because Chevron, although guilty, is not liable thanks to an agreement made with Ecuador’s government. Here we find the real lesson to be learned– This agreement that exempts Chevron from any wrongdoing is like so many others between giant multinational corporations (MNCs) and governments seeking economic gain. In business between countries and MNCs it is the country most willing to turn a blind eye that wins the business. And more often than one would ever hope, lawfulness and the rights of the country’s people are the first to be sacrificed.

I applaud this kind of activism because it draws people in through the humor of a hoax, while ultimately bringing us face to face with a reality that may otherwise go unacknowledged by those of us who are often unwilling to look at life’s harsher truths.

Written by Alicia for Media Roots

Income Gaps Between Very Rich and Everyone Else More Than Tripled In Last Three Decades

CBPP– The gaps in after-tax income between the richest 1 percent of Americans and the middle and poorest fifths of the country more than tripled between 1979 and 2007 (the period for which these data are available), according to data the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) issued last week. Taken together with prior research, the new data suggest greater income concentration at the top of the income scale than at any time since 1928.

While the recession that began in December 2007 likely reduced the income of the wealthiest Americans substantially and may thereby shrink the income gap between rich and poor households, a similar development that occurred around the bursting of the dot.com bubble and the 2001 recession turned out to be just a speed bump. Incomes at the top more than made up the lost ground from 2003 to 2005.

Read full article about the Income Gap.

© COPYRIGHT CBPP, 2010

Adoption 911

EXAMINER– Adoption 911 is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) animal rescue devoted to helping all animals in their time of need. It started when one Los Angeles woman found the need to save horses from slaughter and grew into a foundation dedicated to keeping all creatures from a life of despair, torture, starvation, solitude and slaughter.

It all started one Saturday afternoon late in January when Animal Communicator Candi Cane Cooper had just finished working at the Santa Anita Race Track.
 
“I knew that this day could quite possibly be the hardest day of my life,” Cooper says. “I had plans to go under cover for a documentary, visiting a feed lot where hundreds of horses were being held for slaughter.”
 
Cooper pulled up to the feed lot where a starved and pregnant Mare immediately starting calling out for help. Hundreds of horses were there, all kinds, just waiting for slaughter. But before Cooper could even comprehend the gravity of what she was witnessing, this Mare grabbed her attention.
 
Continue reading about Adoption 911.

© Examiner, 2009

Photo by Candi Cooper

Lesbian Candidate for Oakland Mayor Gains Surprise Allies

NY TIMES– In 2008, church leaders from Oakland were on the front lines of the campaign to ban same-sex marriage. Two years later, some of those same leaders are surprisingly backing Rebecca Kaplan, a City Council member who would become the first openly gay mayor of a major Bay Area city.

A former rabbinical student, Ms. Kaplan makes campaign stops with her well-thumbed, gold-trimmed bible, as she did Wednesday at the mayoral debate at Allen Temple Baptist Church, one of the largest black churches in the city.

Dressed in a dark suit and an open-collared shirt, Ms. Kaplan, who enunciates with the clarity and precision of a preacher, used part of Psalm 118 to make a campaign point: “The rock that the builder rejected shall become the topmost cornerstone, and Oakland will become the most desirable place to live.” The audience applauded. “You have got a Jewish lesbian white woman who comes to black churches and sings with the choir and quotes Scripture better than the members — I just love her,” said Pastor Ray Williams of First Morning Star Baptist Church, who spoke at rallies in favor of Proposition 8, the bar to same-sex marriage.

He is now endorsing Ms. Kaplan. Ms. Kaplan, 40, was elected to the Council in 2008 after serving on the AC Transit board, and political consultants said her broad challenge will be to woo older voters who are familiar with the two front-runners in the race —Don Perata, 65, a former state senator, and Jean Quan, 60, a longtime councilwoman. Ms. Kaplan appeals to the younger, hipper demographic in the city.

Continue reading about Lesbian Candidate for Oakland Mayor Gains Surprise Allies.

© NY Times, 2010

Pam Moore interviews Rebecca Kaplan about public safety, economic development, and being a relative political newcomer with substantial support.

 

Oakland Mayoral candidate Rebecca Kaplan lists her top three priorities for Oakland at the Mayoral Forum sponsored by the Chamber of Commerce.

Learn more at KaplanForMayor.org

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Reply

Bernanke Warns of Looming Economic Crisis

TRUTHOUT– In a surprisingly candid speech at the annual Rhode Island Public Expenditure Council meeting Monday, Federal Reserve Chair Ben Bernanke warned of a potentially dangerous economic future for the country if government spending is not curbed within a few years.

“It is crucially important that we put US fiscal policy on a sustainable path,” Bernanke said. “We should not underestimate these fiscal challenges. Failing to respond to them would endanger our economic future.”

If budget deficits continue to rise at their current pace, Bernanke said, higher interest rates could slow formation of businesses, productivity and economic growth, while a large federal debt could hurt the amount of government funds available for future emergencies, from war to natural disasters.

“The threat to our economy is real and growing,” Bernanke said.

Bernanke outlined a number of “fiscal rules” for Congress to consider implementing through legislation, including constraints on total government expenditure, deficits or debt. Today, Congress operates under a “pay-as-you-go” (PAYGO ) approach that requires tax cuts and spending increases to be offset within a ten-year budget time span, but may not be strong enough for the current economy. “The key question is whether the traditional PAYGO approach is sufficiently ambitious,” Bernanke said. “At its best, PAYGO prevents new tax cuts and mandatory spending increases from making projected budget deficits worse; by construction, PAYGO does not require the Congress to reduce the ever-increasing deficits that are already built into current law.”

Countries like Canada, Switzerland, Finland and the Netherlands have all seen marked improvements in their budgets since adopting fiscal rules that cap government spending. According to the International Monetary Fund, approximately 80 countries have implemented similar fiscal rules. “The weight of the evidence suggests that well-designed rules can help promote improved fiscal performance,” Bernanke said.

If the nation’s economic challenges are not addressed in the near future, Bernanke said, “projections by the CBO (Congressional Budget Office) and others show future budget deficits and debts rising indefinitely and at increasing rates … unsustainable trajectories of deficits and debts will never actually transpire, because creditors would never be willing to lend to a country in which the fiscal debt relative to the national income is rising without limit.”

According to the World Bank’s “Finding the Tipping Point – When Sovereign Debt Turns Bad,” the level at which a country is no longer viable to receive lending is a 77 percent public debt-to-GDP ratio. “If the debt is above this threshold, each percentage point costs 0.017 percentage points of annual real growth.”

According to the International Monetary Fund, the 2009 debt-to-GDP ratio in the United States was 83.2 percent. James A. Bacon Jr. of the Washington Examiner states, “the US is experiencing a small growth penalty today: about one-tenth of a percentage point. By mid-decade, however, the growth penalty could swell to .56 percent yearly – more than a half percentage point.”

The challenge of reducing deficit doesn’t end with capping government spending. In fact, Bernanke said, “economic conditions provide little scope for reducing deficits significantly further over the next year or two … premature fiscal tightening could put the recovery at risk.” But at the same time, “if current policy settings are maintained and under reasonable assumptions about economic growth, the federal budget will be on an unsustainable path in coming years, with the ratio of federal debt held by the public to national income rising at an increasing pace.”

Congress faces several unpopular choices to cut the deficit. The CBO has projected that federal spending for Medicare and Medicaid could be double the national income over the next 25 years. Social Security is also threatened as the country’s population ages and the number of workers paying taxes grows at a slower rate than the number of people receiving benefits. State and local budgets will also struggle to meet public pension and health care obligations for retired people. “Estimates of unfunded pension liabilities for the states as whole span a wide range, but some researchers put the figure as high as $2 trillion at the end of 2009,” Bernanke said, “[and] one recent estimate suggests that state governments have a collective liability of almost $600 billion for retiree health benefits.”

“Herbert Stein, a wise economist, once said, ‘If something cannot go on forever, it will stop.’ One way or the other, fiscal adjustments sufficient to stabilize the federal budget will certainly occur at some point,” Bernanke said. “The only real question is whether these adjustments will take place through a careful and deliberative process that weighs priorities … or whether the needed fiscal adjustments will be a rapid and painful response to a looming or actual fiscal crisis.”

Although Bernanke did not plainly endorse any particular methods of reducing the deficit, his message was clear throughout the speech. “History makes clear that countries that continually spend beyond their means suffer slower growth in incomes and living standards and are prone to greater economic and financial instability.”

Creative Commons License
This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.