Media Roots TV – Greg Palast & Vultures’ Picnic

MEDIA ROOTS — On November 14, 2011, Abby Martin of Media Roots interviewed award-winning journalist and best-selling author Greg Palast after his talk at the First Congregational Church of Berkeley.

Greg Palast, a freelance journalist for the BBC as well as British newspaper The Observer, discusses his newly published book Vultures’ Picnic, corporate collusion, the bought-and-paid-for-media establishment, the role of citizen journalism around the Occupy Wall Street Movement, and the value of organisations such as Project Censored.

MR

***

Abby Martin of Media Roots Interviews Greg Palast about Vultures’ Picnic

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Reply

MR Original – Richard Clarke’s Peculiar Evolution

 

MEDIA ROOTS- Richard Clarke, former anti-terrorism chief under Bush, has given a new account of the 9/11 story that implicates the CIA for intentionally obstructing the investigation and withholding vital information that would have likely prevented the attacks. His testimony smashes a hole in the government’s ‘incompetence’ theory that rationalized their inaction. It also invalidates the mindset of ‘oh well, there was so much intelligence coming in that we couldn’t differentiate the real threats from the fake ones’, by pointing out that someone from the inside must have been purposefully obstructing him from doing his job. 


The filmmakers of 9/11: Press for Truth interview Richard Clarke about the revelations.

There are numerous things very telling about Clarke’s sudden revival with this information. His new, more frustrated demeanor hints at something deeper that he could suspect or possibly know to be true about the attacks. Clarke suggests that Saudi intelligence was involved, further connecting the dots between Bandar Bush and the Saudi Royal Family to 9/11.

Al Qaeda on US Government Payroll

Shockingly, Clarke also theorizes that the CIA tried to recruit a member of Al Qaeda who later turned out to be one of the 19 hijackers, proving that the CIA was well aware of Al Qaeda ‘cells’ prior to the attacks. His allegations add credibility to the theory that some of the hijackers could have possibly been on the US government payroll.

If one studies the JFK case, there are eerily similar consistencies with Lee Harvey Oswald’s background as a Russian intelligence agent or potential double agent working for the US. Oswald listed his address in the same New Orleans building as CIA Bay of Pigs co-organizer, Guy Banister. Similarly, five of the 19 hijackers were trained at secure US military installations in the 90s, and three of them listed their addresses at the Pensacola naval base in Florida.

Clarke astoundingly divulges a theory that George Tenant, along with up to 40 CIA agents (by his estimate), knew about attempts to get one of the hijackers on the CIA payroll as an informant up to four months before 9/11.

We don’t know for certain whether Clarke is telling the truth, but what we do know is that over time insiders like Clarke might feel safer revealing more pieces of the 9/11 puzzle. Possibly he is plagued with a guilty conscious, or maybe the US government is still using him to spread conflicting propaganda in order to manipulate the narrative.

Unsurprisingly, the corporate press hasn’t touched the explosive allegation. What is surprising, however, is the lack of coverage from the so-called ‘alternative’ media sites like Salon, Slate, and Wired. There seems to be an active campaign among both the progressive media establishment and the corporate news to censor such a revelatory story.

Who is Richard Blee?

The name Richard Blee comes up multiple times throughout Clarke’s video interview. He points the finger at Blee and accuses him of being a key player in withholding information that could have prevented the attacks. As more investigating is done into this case, hopefully Blee will be further questioned. For now, George Tenant, Blee and others accused by Clarke have already written a rebuttal to his allegations of the ‘lady doth protest too much’ varietal.

Investigative journalism like that done by Secrecy Kills and the 9/11: Press for Truth crew is rare. We give high honors to the people who dug deep into this story and look forward to their future revelations. Make sure to visit their website Secrecy Kills and listen to an hour long podcast detailing much more than what is discussed here. 

Written by Robbie and Abby Martin

Project Censored Speaks on Media Censorship & 9/11

MEDIA ROOTS- Project Censored spoke about corporate media censorship, managed news and the media blackout surrounding 9/11 at Oakland’s anniversary film festival on September 8, 2011. Watch the powerful talks by Mickey Huff, Director of Project Censored, and Peter Phillips.

 

Mickey Huff, Director of Project Censored, gives a poignant, powerful talk.

 

Peter Phillips, former Director of Project Censored, moved the room with this speech.

Learn more at www.projectcensored.org

Photo by Flickr User Meredith Farmer

MR on Project Censored’s 9/11 Anniversary Show

MEDIA ROOTS- Project Censored hosts a special tenth anniversary 9/11 commemoration show on KPFA radio. Abby Martin of Media Roots gives a special news report on 9/11 at 6:55 going over the costs of 9/11 wars, the neglect to the first responders and the true threat of terrorism. The show also features guests Dr. Anthony Hall, Professor of Globalization Studies and Kathy McGrade, Engineer and member of Architects and Engineers of 9/11 Truth.

The Morning Mix with Project Censored – September 9, 2011 at 8:00am

Click to listen (or download)

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Reply

In California, Much Is Officially Secret

MEDIA ROOTS- There are some things that are justifiably kept secret within the state bureaucracy, like personal data and information about residents. However, the expansion of secrecy in every avenue of California’s government has made it increasingly difficult to gauge its efficiency and affect change at the legislative level.

Surprisingly, lawmakers’ schedules are withheld from public record, widening the divide between the people and the government by limiting a constituency’ ability to shape policy or voice their opinions to representatives. The OC Register recently compiled a report detailing the era of secrecy that reveals how much is actually being kept secret, and why.

Abby

***

OC REGISTER– Secrecy has seeped into every corner of state government, making it difficult to gauge Sacramento’s effectiveness and discretion. An Orange County Register review of the Government Code found at least 500 provisions that exempt specific records or information from public disclosure while another 16 code sections prohibit the release of broad categories of documents, including every complaint filed with a licensing body or investigatory agency, all communications with members of the Legislature and any document whose release does not serve the public interest.

Official secrets are held in every office and department in state government, from food and agriculture, public health and the DMV to corrections, social services and the Legislature, where the Assembly recently made headlines (and drew a lawsuit) over its refusal to release documents related to members’ current budgets.

California’s deference to secrecy is often couched as a public service, and indeed much of the information held in confidence actually protects residents. Nobody wants the government giving out Social Security numbers or publicly releasing the results of AIDS tests. But the Government Code is also littered with exemptions that freedom of information advocate Terry Francke criticizes as “hard to justify.” Why are the names of asparagus producers, red light camera photos and the urine tests of race horses confidential?

CAPITOL’S BLACK BOX

Nothing is more valuable in Sacramento than access. If you can get a meeting with a lawmaker, you can influence votes and shape public policy. Among Capitol insiders, the personal meeting is thought to be among the most important parts of the legislative process.

How do you get a meeting with a lawmaker? Many legislators pride themselves on taking meetings with any constituent who asks, but it’s widely believed that most lawmakers reserve their time for campaign contributors. In fact, some insiders say lawmakers make no effort to hear both sides of an issue, that they only take meetings with the side that gave them money.

It’s difficult to see if that’s true, however, because both houses of the Legislature say that lawmakers’ schedules are secret – even if legislators want to release them. The Rules Committees of the Senate and the Assembly prevented lawmakers from disclosing their schedules when reporters asked for them earlier this year, saying that the committees, not the lawmakers themselves, actually have possession of the documents.

Secrecy has seeped into every corner of state government, making it difficult to gauge Sacramento’s effectiveness and discretion. An Orange County Register review of the Government Code found at least 500 provisions that exempt specific records or information from public disclosure while another 16 code sections prohibit the release of broad categories of documents, including every complaint filed with a licensing body or investigatory agency, all communications with members of the Legislature and any document whose release does not serve the public interest. Official secrets are held in every office and department in state government, from food and agriculture, public health and the DMV to corrections, social services and the Legislature, where the Assembly recently made headlines (and drew a lawsuit) over its refusal to release documents related to members’ current budgets.
California’s deference to secrecy is often couched as a public service, and indeed much of the information held in confidence actually protects residents. Nobody wants the government giving out Social Security numbers or publicly releasing the results of AIDS tests. But the Government Code is also littered with exemptions that freedom of information advocate Terry Francke criticizes as “hard to justify.” Why are the names of asparagus producers, red light camera photos and the urine tests of race horses confidential?
CAPITOL’S BLACK BOX
Nothing is more valuable in Sacramento than access. If you can get a meeting with a lawmaker, you can influence votes and shape public policy. Among Capitol insiders, the personal meeting is thought to be among the most important parts of the legislative process.
How do you get a meeting with a lawmaker? Many legislators pride themselves on taking meetings with any constituent who asks, but it’s widely believed that most lawmakers reserve their time for campaign contributors. In fact, some insiders say lawmakers make no effort to hear both sides of an issue, that they only take meetings with the side that gave them money.
It’s difficult to see if that’s true, however, because both houses of the Legislature say that lawmakers’ schedules are secret – even if legislators want to release them. The Rules Committees of the Senate and the Assembly prevented lawmakers from disclosing their schedules when reporters asked for them earlier this year, saying that the committees, not the lawmakers themselves, actually have possession of the documents.

Read more about In California, Much Is Officially Secret.

© 2011 The Orange Country Register

Photo by Flickr user Mark Luethi