GUARDIAN– A grim picture of the US and Britain’s legacy in Iraq has been revealed in a massive leak of American military documents that detail torture, summary executions and war crimes.
Almost
400,000 secret US army field reports have been passed to the Guardian
and a number of other international media organisations via the
whistleblowing website WikiLeaks.
The
electronic archive is believed to emanate from the same dissident US
army intelligence analyst who earlier this year is alleged to have
leaked a smaller tranche of 90,000 logs chronicling bloody encounters
and civilian killings in the Afghan war.
The new logs detail how:
•
US authorities failed to investigate hundreds of reports of abuse,
torture, rape and even murder by Iraqi police and soldiers whose conduct
appears to be systematic and normally unpunished.
• A US
helicopter gunship involved in a notorious Baghdad incident had
previously killed Iraqi insurgents after they tried to surrender.
•
More than 15,000 civilians died in previously unknown incidents. US and
UK officials have insisted that no official record of civilian
casualties exists but the logs record 66,081 non-combatant deaths out of
a total of 109,000 fatalities.
The numerous reports of detainee
abuse, often supported by medical evidence, describe prisoners shackled,
blindfolded and hung by wrists or ankles, and subjected to whipping,
punching, kicking or electric shocks. Six reports end with a detainee’s
apparent death.
As recently as December the Americans were passed a video apparently showing Iraqi army officers executing a prisoner
in Tal Afar, northern Iraq. The log states: “The footage shows
approximately 12 Iraqi army soldiers. Ten IA soldiers were talking to
one another while two soldiers held the detainee. The detainee had his
hands bound … The footage shows the IA soldiers moving the detainee into
the street, pushing him to the ground, punching him and shooting him.”
The
report named at least one perpetrator and was passed to coalition
forces. But the logs reveal that the coalition has a formal policy of
ignoring such allegations. They record “no investigation is necessary”
and simply pass reports to the same Iraqi units implicated in the
violence. By contrast all allegations involving coalition forces are
subject to formal inquiries. Some cases of alleged abuse by UK and US
troops are also detailed in the logs.
MSNBC– U.S. government medical researchers intentionally infected
hundreds of people in Guatemala, including institutionalized mental
patients, with gonorrhea and syphilis without their knowledge or
permission more than 60 years ago.
Many of those infected were encouraged to pass the infection onto others as part of the study. About one third of those who were infected never got adequate treatment.
On Friday, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius offered extensive apologies for actions taken by the U.S. Public Health Service.
“The sexually transmitted disease inoculation study conducted from
1946-1948 in Guatemala was clearly unethical,” according to the joint
statement from Clinton and Sebelius. “Although these events occurred
more than 64 years ago, we are outraged that such reprehensible research
could have occurred under the guise of public health. We deeply regret
that it happened, and we apologize to all the individuals who were
affected by such abhorrent research practices.”
Secretary Clinton called Guatemalan president Alvara Cabellaros
Thursday night to reaffirm the importance of the U.S. relationship with
the Latin American country.
President Barack Obama called Cabellaros Friday afternoon, according to a statement from White House press secretary Robert Gibbs.
“The people of Guatemala are our close friends and neighbors in the
Americas,” the government statement says. “As we move forward to better
understand this appalling event, we reaffirm the importance of our
relationship with Guatemala, and our respect for the Guatemalan people,
as well as our commitment to the highest standards of ethics in medical research.”
During a conference call Friday with National Institutes of Health
Director Francis Collins and Assistant Secretary of State Arturo
Valenzuela, officials noted that there were no formalized regulations
regarding protection of human studies during the 1940s.
In addition to the apology, the U.S. is setting up commissions to
ensure that human medical research conducted around the globe meets
“rigorous ethical standards.” U.S. officials are also launching
investigations to uncover exactly what happened during the experiments.
TELEGRAPH– Tens
of thousands of secret American military documents have been leaked disclosing
how Nato forces have killed scores of civilians in unreported incidents in
Afghanistan.
The classified memos also reveal the
secret efforts of coalition forces to hunt down and “kill or capture” senior
Taliban and al-Qaeda figures.
And they document growing evidence
that Iran and Pakistan is supporting the insurgency. Although many of the
claims in the documents, of which there are more than 90,000, have been aired
previously, the leak to the website Wikileaks is highly embarrassing. It was
condemned by the White House last night, which said the information could
threaten the safety of coalition operations.
The Ministry of Defence said it was
still studying the leaked documents.
The most damaging allegations
surround the killing of civilians by coalition troops. The documents claim that
195 civilians have been improperly killed and 174 wounded. Many were innocent
motorcyclists or drivers shot after being suspected of being suicide bombers.
In one incident, a US patrol
machine-gunned a bus, wounding or killing 15 passengers. Incidents involving
British troops killing civilians in Kabul are also detailed.
Several civilian deaths were thought
to have been caused by remote-controlled drones commanded from Nevada,
thousands of miles away.
Many of the incidents have never
previously been disclosed.
The memos also reveal the operations
of a secret special forces “black unit” that is charged with the “kill or
capture” without trial of Taliban leaders.
There are said to have been 2,000
civilians killed by Taliban roadside bombs.
The suspected influence of foreign
governments in the insurgency is revealed. Pakistan receives $1billion a year
from the US to help fight the insurgents, but the documents suggest that
members of its security services, the ISI, have met Taliban leaders to organise
resistance against US forces and even kill US-supported Afghan leaders.
Activist, Mother, and Voice of the Gulf People, Kindra Arnesen sat down
with the Project Gulf Impact team, Matt Smith, Heather Rally, and Gavin
Garrison recently to reveal shocking new information about the BP oil
disaster and why the whole world should be paying attention to the Gulf.
A must watch for anyone wanting new information on the Gulf of Mexico,
she reveals shocking new information sure to send waves through the
country.
Kindra Arnesen, LA local speaks at the Gulf Emergency Summit. Hear the horrors from the front lines and behind scenes workings of the BP
Gulf Oil Spill Catastrophe.
WSWS– Iraq war veteran Ethan McCord, who is seen running with an Iraqi child in
his arms in the video posted by WikiLeaks of a July 2007 massacre of civilians
in Baghdad, talked to the World Socialist Web Site about the impact of
this and similar experiences in Iraq.
The video, which records the shocking deaths of at least 12 individuals,
including two Iraqi journalists employed by Reuters, has been viewed more than
6 million times on the Internet.
McCord, together with another former member of the company, Josh Stieber,
have addressed an open “Letter
of Reconciliation” to the Iraqi people taking responsibility for their role
in this incident and other acts of violence. Both soldiers deployed to Iraq
in 2007 and left the Army last year.
In the letter, McCord and Stieber said, “…we acknowledge our part in the
deaths and injuries of your loved ones.” They insisted that “the acts depicted
in this video are everyday occurrences of this war: this is the nature of how
US-led wars are carried out in this region.”
The night before speaking to the WSWS, Ethan McCord had learned that the
widow of one of the dozen men killed—the father of the two children he tried to
rescue—had forgiven him and Stieber for their role in the incident.
Ahlam Abdelhussein Tuman, 33, told the Times of London:
“I can accept their apology, because they saved my children and if it were not
for them, maybe my two little children would be dead.”
Her husband, Saleh Mutashar Tuman, had arrived on the scene of the carnage
caused by a US Apache helicopter firing into a crowd and attempted to aid the
wounded. The helicopter opened fire again, killing him and at least one wounded
man and wounding his two children, who were sitting in his van.
The widow urged the two former soldiers to continue to speak out. “I would
like the American people and the whole world to understand what happened here
in Iraq. We
lost our country and our lives were destroyed.”
Can you explain why you and Josh Stieber wrote the “Letter of
Reconciliation” to the Iraqi people?
We originally wanted it to go to the family members of those involved that
day in the WikiLeaks video. Then in turn we wanted it to be more along the
lines of to all Iraqi people as well. We wanted the Iraqi people to know that
not everybody sees them as being dehumanized and that there are plenty of
Americans and other people who care for them as human beings and wish for them
to live long and happy lives and don’t agree with the war and the policies
behind it.
I just found out last night that the letter was shown to the family, the
children and the mother as well. She has forgiven myself and Josh and is very
happy to see the work that Josh and I are doing. There was a London
Times reporter who went there to see what they felt about the letter.
And there is one comment from the mother that she could forgive me because if
it wasn’t for me her children might be dead.
That must make you feel pretty good.
Definitely, but it doesn’t stop there for me or for Josh. We are definitely
going to continue speaking out on this and do everything we can to have our
voices heard about the policies, the rules of engagement and the war. As well,
we are hoping to set up a trust fund for the children, as we know that they’ve
had a pretty rough life afterward due to the injuries and whatnot. Hopefully,
it will get them some medical care.
Could you describe the events of that day and what your platoon was
doing?
It was much like many of the days in Iraq.
The neighborhood we were in was pretty volatile; at least it was on the rise,
with IED emplacements and with our platoons being shot at with RPGs and sniper
fire. We didn’t know who was attacking us. It was never actually really clear,
at least in my eyes, who the supposed “enemy” was.
We were conducting what were called knock-and-searches, where we would knock
on the doors of the homes and search for documents pertaining to militias or
any weapons they weren’t supposed to have or any bomb-making materials. We
didn’t really find anything at all.
We were getting ready to wrap up at about one
o’clock in the afternoon. We started to funnel into an alleyway and
started to take small arms fire from rooftops from AK-47s. We didn’t know what
was happening with the Apache helicopters. They were attached to us from
another unit to watch over us for this mission, which was called “Ranger
Dominance.”
We could hear them open fire, but those of us who were on the ground,
outside of the vehicles, had no idea what was taking place. We couldn’t hear
the radio chatter and we were pretty caught up in our own situation.
When that situation was neutralized, we were told to walk up onto the scene.
I was one of about six soldiers who were dismounted to first arrive on the
scene.
What did you see when you got there?
It was pretty much absolute carnage. I had never seen anybody shot by a
30-millimeter round before, and frankly don’t ever want to see that again. It
almost seemed unreal, like something out of a bad B-horror movie. When these
rounds hit you they kind of explode—people with their heads half-off, their
insides hanging out of their bodies, limbs missing. I did see two RPGs on the
scene as well as a few AK-47s.
But then I heard the cries of a child. They weren’t necessarily cries of
agony, but more like the cries of a small child who was scared out of her mind.
So I ran up to the van where the cries were coming from. You can actually see
in the scenes from the video where another soldier and I come up to the driver
and the passenger sides of the van.
The soldier I was with, as soon as he saw the children, turned around,
started vomiting and ran. He didn’t want any part of that scene with the
children anymore.
What I saw when I looked inside the van was a small girl, about three or
four years old. She had a belly wound and glass in her hair and eyes. Next to
her was a boy about seven or eight years old who had a wound to the right side
of the head. He was laying half on the floorboard and half on the bench. I
presumed he was dead; he wasn’t moving.
Next to him was who I presumed was the father. He was hunched over sideways,
almost in a protective way, trying to protect his children. And you could tell
that he had taken a 30-millimeter round to the chest. I pretty much knew that
he was deceased.
I grabbed the little girl and yelled for a medic. Me and the medic ran into
the houses behind where the van crashed to check whether there were any other
wounds. I was trying to take as much glass out of her eyes as I could. We
dressed the wound and then the medic ran the girl to the Bradley. You can hear
in the video where he says, “there’s nothing else I can do here; we need to
evacuate the child.”
I then went back outside and went to the van. I don’t know why. I thought
both of them were dead, but something told me to go back. That’s when I saw the
boy move with what appeared to be a labored breath. So I stated screaming, “The
boy’s alive.” I grabbed him and cradled him in my arms and kept telling him,
“Don’t die, don’t die.” He opened his eyes, looked up at me. I told him, “It’s
OK, I have you.” His eyes rolled back into his head, and I kept telling him,
“It’s OK, I’ve got you.” I ran up to the Bradley and placed him inside.
My platoon leader was standing there at the time, and he yelled at me for
doing what I did. He told me to “stop worrying about these motherfucking kids
and start worrying about pulling security.” So after that I went up and pulled
security on a rooftop.
Did you face further repercussions for what you did that day?
After coming back to the FOB [forward operating base], nobody really talked
about what had happened that day. Everybody went to their rooms; they were
tired. Some of them went to make phone calls. And I was in my room because I
had to clean the blood off of my IBA [body armor] and my uniform—the blood from
these children. And I was having a flood of emotions and having a real hard
time dealing with having seen children this way, as I’m sure most caring human
beings would.
So I went to see a staff sergeant who was in my chain of command and told
him I needed to see mental health about what was going on in my head. He told
me to “quit being a pussy” and to “suck it up and be a soldier.” He told me
that if I wanted to go to mental health, there would be repercussions, one of
them being labeled a “malingerer,” which is actually a crime in the US Army.
For fear of that happening to me, I in turn went back to my room and tried
to bottle up as much emotion as I could and pretty much just suck it up and
drive on.
You had another nine months or more still to go in your tour then?
That’s right. It was a pretty long time with having to deal with the
emotions, not only of that, but of many other days. What happened then was not
an isolated incident. Stuff like that happens on a daily basis in Iraq.
Are there other incidents that took place in the following months of
your tour that bear this out?
Yes. Our rules of engagement were changing on an almost daily basis. But we
had a pretty gung-ho commander, who decided that because we were getting hit by
IEDs a lot, there would be a new battalion SOP [standard operating procedure].
He goes, “If someone in your line gets hit with an IED, 360 rotational fire.
You kill every motherfucker on the street.” Myself and Josh and a lot of other
soldiers were just sitting there looking at each other like, “Are you kidding
me? You want us to kill women and children on the street?”
And you couldn’t just disobey orders to shoot, because they could just make
your life hell in Iraq.
So like with myself, I would shoot up into the roof of a building instead of
down on the ground toward civilians. But I’ve seen it many times, where people
are just walking down the street and an IED goes off and the troops open fire
and kill them.
During this period were you conscious that you were suffering from
post-traumatic stress?
Yes I knew, because I would be angry at everyone and everything and at
myself even more. I would watch movies and listen to music as much as possible
just to escape reality. I didn’t really talk to many people.
The other problem I had is that before the incident shown in the WikiLeaks
video, I was the gung-ho soldier. I thought I was going over there to do the
greater good. I thought my job over there was to protect the Iraqi people and
that this was a job with honor and courage and duty.
I was hit by an IED within two weeks of my being in Iraq.
And I didn’t understand why people were throwing rocks at us, why I was being
shot at and why we’re being blown up, when I have it in my head that I was here
to help these people.
But the first real serious doubt, where I could no longer justify to myself
being in Iraq
or serving in the Army, was on that day in July 2007.
How did you come to join the military?
I had always wanted to be in the military, even as a child. My grandfather
and my uncles were military. Then September 11 happened, and I decided it was
my duty as an American to join the military, so that’s what I did in 2002. I
joined the Navy. In 2005, when the Army had what they called “Operation Blue to
Green,” pulling sailors and airmen into the Army with bigger bonuses, I made a
lateral transfer.
I had pretty much had it in my head that I was going to make a career out of
the military. But going to Iraq
and dealing with the Army completely changed my outlook.
What was your reaction when you saw the WikiLeaks video?
Shock. I had dropped my children off at school one morning, came home and
turned on MSNBC, and there I am running across the screen carrying a child.
I knew immediately it was me. I know the scene. It is burned into my head. I
relive it almost every day. It was just a shock that it was up there, and it
angered me. I was angry because it was in my face again.
I had actually started to get a little bit better before the tape was
released. I wasn’t thinking about it as often; it was getting a little bit
easier to go to sleep. But then everything that I had buried and pushed away
came bubbling back to the surface. And the nightmares began again, the anger,
the feeling of being used. It all came back. It wasn’t a good feeling; it was
like a huge slap in the face.
Do you think that the way you were told to forget about the kids and
suck it up is indicative of the general culture in the military?
Yes, there is such a stigma placed on soldiers seeking mental health. It’s
like you’re showing a huge sign of weakness for needing to speak about things
or for seeking help even for getting to sleep. There’s fear of being chastised
or being made fun of. So you end up self-medicating on alcohol. And as you
probably know, alcohol is a depressant and just makes it worse.
I was self-medicating when I came home, and I was hospitalized in a mental
institute by the Army because of my problems with PTSD and self-medication.
There were many times when I felt that I could no longer take what was going
on in my head and the best thing for me to do would be to put a bullet in my
head. But each time I thought about that, I would look at the pictures of my
children and think back on that day and how the father of those children was taken
away and how horrible it must be for them. And if I were to do that, I would be
putting my children in the same position.
Do you think that the pressure to bury these problems is driven by a
fear that if you are allowed to question your own experiences, it can call into
question the nature of the war itself?
I was not able to talk about it, not able to get answers to like how I was
feeling about this, why were we doing this, what are we doing here? It was just
straight up, “You’re going to do this, and you’re going to shut up about it.”
Soldiers aren’t mindless drones. They have feelings. They have emotions. You
can’t just make them go out and do something without telling them, this is why
we’re doing it. And the pressure just builds up.
You hear in the video the Apache helicopter crew saying some things that are
pretty heart-wrenching and cold. I’m guilty of it too. We all are. It’s kind of
a coping mechanism. You feel bad at the time for what you did and you take
those emotions and push them down. That’s what the Army teaches you to do, just
push them down. And in a sense it works. It helps you get through the hard
times. But unfortunately, there’s no outlet for that anymore, once you get out
of the Army. When you get back home, there’s no one to joke around with, nobody
you can talk to about these instances.
What happens to that soldier? He’s going to blow up. And when he blows up,
more than likely it’s going to be on his family, his close friends or on
himself. So I think that’s why soldiers end up killing themselves.
So a terrible price is being paid for this war in the US itself?
Yes, I feel that just as the Iraqis, the soldiers are victims of this war as
well. Like we say in our letter to the Iraqis, the government is ignoring them
and it is also ignoring us. Instead of people being upset at a few soldiers in
a video who were doing what they were trained to do, I think people need to be
more upset at the system that trained these soldiers. They are doing exactly
what the Army wants them to do. Getting angry and calling these soldiers names
and saying how callous and cold-hearted they are isn’t going to change the
system.
What do you think drives this system? Why are they sent to do this?
As far as the hidden agenda behind the war, I couldn’t even begin to guess
what that is. I do know that the system is being driven by some people with
pretty low morals and values, and they attempt to instill those values in the
soldiers.
But the people who are driving the system don’t have to deal with the
repercussions. It’s the American people who have to deal with them. They’re the
ones who have to deal with all of these soldiers who come back from war, have
no outlets and blow up.
I still live with this every day. When I close my eyes I see what happened
that day and many other days like a slide show in my head. The smells come back
to me. The cries of the children come back to me. The people driving this big
war machine, they don’t have to deal with this. They live in their $36 million
mansions and sleep well at night.
Were you hopeful that with the 2008 election these kinds of things would
be brought to a halt. Were you disappointed that they have continued and
escalated?
I am not part of any party. Was I hopeful? Yes. Was I surprised that we are
still there? No. I’m not surprised at all. There’s something else lying
underneath there. It’s not Republican or Democrat; it’s money. There’s
something else lying underneath it where Republicans and Democrats together
want to keep us in Iraq
and Afghanistan.
I am hopeful that the video and our speaking out will help. There’s the old
adage that war is hell, but I don’t think people really understand just what a
hell war is. Until you see it first-hand, you don’t really know what’s going
on. Like I said, this video shows you an every-day occurrence in Iraq,
and I can only assume, in Afghanistan.
So I hope people wake up and see the actual hells of war.