Activists Protest BP Sponsorship in Tate Museum

CONSUMERIST– A group of art activists this week staged an unsanctioned protest inside the world-famous Tate Modern museum in London by pouring oil over a naked body lying on the floor.

Wearing black hoods, two of the artists slowly pour the oil from gas cans painted with the BP logo over the fetal form of a third member lying naked. A Bach piece in minor plays underneath the video, which is safe for work.

The group behind the protest is called Liberate Tate, whose aim is to get the museum to break off ties with BP and stop taking sponsorship payola from the oil giant. The group was formed in 2010 during a workshop on art and activism that the museum itself sponsored. “The art activists running the workshops,” says the group on its website, “were told by Tate curators that no interventions could be made against the museum’s sponsors. The workshop participants refused this censorship, ended the workshop with an intervention and decided to continue their work together, setting up Liberate Tate the following spring.”

“Liberate Tate believes Tate’s sponsorship by BP, a corporation engaged in socially and ecologically destructive activities, is incompatible with the museum’s ethical guidelines,” continues the group’s statement. “Tate’s stated vision in regard to sustainability and climate change and its reputation as a progressive institution is damaged by its association with oil companies. In addition, Tate’s mission is undermined if visitors to its galleries cannot enjoy great art without the museum making them complicit in creating climate chaos. Liberate Tate calls on the museum’s governing body to recognise this and end its relationship with BP.”

Human Cost, Tate Britain Performance (87 minutes), charcoal and sunflower oil 20 April 2011– First anniversary of the Gulf of Mexico disaster.

© 2011 Consumerist

LIBERATETATE– On the same day, 166 people who work in the arts published a letter in the Guardian calling on Tate to end its sponsorship relationship with BP. “In the year since its catastrophic oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, BP has massively ramped up its investment in controversial tar sands extraction in Canada, has been shown to have been a key backer of the Mubarak regime in Egypt, and has attempted to commence drilling for oil in the Arctic Ocean. While BP continues to jeopardise ecosystems communities and the climate by the reckless pursuit of “frontier” oil, cultural institutions like Tate damage their reputation by continuing to be associated with such a destructive corporation.

The massive cuts to public arts funding in the UK have left hundreds of culturally important arts organisations in a position of great financial vulnerability, which means that the debate about the appropriateness of particular potential corporate sponsors like BP and Shell is more relevant than ever. As people working in the arts, we believe that corporate sponsorship does not exist in an ethical vacuum. In light of the negative social and ecological impacts of BP around the world, we urge Tate to demonstrate its commitment to a sustainable future by ending its sponsorship relationship with BP.”

‘End oil sponsorship of the arts’ on Facebook, @liberatetate on twitter

http://www.liberatetate.org

MR Exclusive – Interview with Jeanmarie Simpson

MEDIA ROOTS-  In 2002, Jeanmarie Simpson co-adapted the book, Amigas: Letters of Friendship and Exile, a chronicle of correspondence between two Chilean friends separated during the Pinochet era. The theatre adaptation, Amigas, won a 2003 grant from the National Endowment for the Arts.

Later that year, Simpson stumbled across a reference to Jeannette Rankin, lifelong pacifist and the first and only US Congresswoman who voted against US entry into both world wars. Her discovery of Rankin led to the production of A Single Woman, a play that toured worldwide and was subsequently made into a a film featuring the talents of Martin Sheen, Patricia Arquette, Peter Coyote, Judd Nelson and Joni Mitchell.

In 2008 Simpson co-adapted another book called Powder: Writing by Women in the Ranks from Vietnam to Iraq into a solo piece called Coming in Hot. She has performed the show dozens of times in Arizona, California, Washington and Nevada and has garnered rave reviews on Huffington Post. A documentary film about the play is currently in production.

Simpson’s newest solo play, Mary’s Joy: The Anatomy of a Martyr, is ready to meet the public and has already been performed at a school at CU Boulder. I had the honor of sitting down with Jeanmarie Simpson and getting some insight on her work, art, and what it means to be a self proclaimed “artivist”.

***

Cynthia Schwartz: How do you choose your characters? How do you decide whose lives are expansive enough, or interesting enough that you could step inside them and actually become that person on stage?

Jeanmarie Simpson: I guess it’s my enthusiasm for clarity and justice and my feminist heart that leads me to the characters I want to write about and play. I love that these women speak for me, they’re a joy to make a case for, as an artist, because I am so moved by them and their lives.

CS: When you get something back from the audience, does that feed you not only as an actor, but do the characters respond differently during different performances?

JS: Absolutely. My work is deeply responsive to the energy in a room. When the audience is lively and engaged from the get-go, then so is the character. When an audience is more subdued, the performance will be sensitive to that and not seek to overwhelm them right off the bat. That’s the beauty of live performance. It’s an intimate communication. I feel so honored every time anyone is willing to sit and watch and/or listen to me for two hours.

CS: Tell us about Mary Dyer. She was hanged for being a Quaker?

JS: Yes. She was hanged on June 1, 1660, for being a Quaker in Boston, specifically. She had been banished and kept returning.

CS:  The play is subtitled “the anatomy of a martyr.” Can you dissect that for us?

JS: Sure. Whenever an event as dramatic as an execution happens, people become very interested in the “why” of it, and become really curious about the background of the person. We, as a species, seem to be fascinated by criminals who are killed by the state – I mean look at all the documentaries and TV shows that go over every little detail of their childhoods, etc. In Mary’s case, I was deeply intrigued by the notion of a colonial woman with six living children, one of them an infant, getting on a ship alone and going back to England for seven years. I knew she was one of the first Quakers and that she was hanged by the Puritans in Boston, but it’s her relationship with her husband and children that really hooked me- the trajectory of her life led to such a scary ending. She was incredibly determined to get through to the authorities, to turn their hearts, and that determination kept her moving forward. She believed that if she kept advancing in the struggle, something really beautiful would happen.

CS: Almost sounds like a suicide bomber.

JS: Hmmm. Yes. Maybe so, in terms of dying and believing in something beyond death, but she didn’t take anyone else with her. She wasn’t a killer.

CS: Many people view suicide as a selfish act. I can see how some might say that Mary Dyer is profoundly selfish, leaving a husband and all of those children behind to miss her and be left with such horrible images of her death.

JS: True. That’s a theme that is very true, no matter when it happens, today or 350 years ago. Without giving too much away, I think when people see the show and hear Mary’s story, they’ll maybe gain some understanding and a bit more compassion towards people who may be dealing with depression or suicidal thoughts. To label those people as selfish is really too easy. There is a community of complex human beings who suffer from mental diseases and they are really punished for it, by society in general. The stigma is much more powerful than is the the movement to make sure there’s plenty of help for troubled people. So many things can trigger chemical changes in the brain that can lead to all kinds of disorders. I think anyone who lived the life Mary Dyer lived would have been hard pressed not to become disturbed.

CS: Is it also a religious play? Will I walk away wanting to become a Quaker?

JS: (Laughs) I don’t know- I don’t think so. It’s much more about tolerance than it is any kind of missionary piece. Mary was always driven by a deep belief that love and grace are more appropriate expressions by clergy than totalitarianism marked by torture and execution. She had an intense moral compass and couldn’t accept the status quo. I hope that you’ll get a chance to see the show and meet her. She’s really something.

CS: At this point you’re doing a series of dramatic readings rather than a full-blown production, is that correct?

JS: Yes. We’re going to be doing readings, collecting donations and raising the money to stage the show in a theatre. We’re looking at several different spaces. Meanwhile, we can raise a bit of awareness about the Quakers and the Rocky Mountain Peace and Justice Center, here in Boulder. They have been doing such great work for so long and they’re always in need of support. Half of the proceeds will go to them, and the other half will go to Universal Arts Boulder, a new company that a group of us have started. This is a very exciting time of life for me, that’s for sure.

***

Written by Cynthia Schwartz

Playwright and actor Jeanmarie Simpson’s one-woman show is called Mary’s Joy: The Anatomy of a Martyr and it’s currently playing in Boulder, Colorado. For more information please visit universalartsboulder.wordpress.com or jeanmariesimpson.wordpress.com.