<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bill S.1867 Seeks Military Powers Against Americans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mediaroots.org/senate-bill-s-1867-seeks-military-powers-against-americans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mediaroots.org/senate-bill-s-1867-seeks-military-powers-against-americans/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2018 16:55:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeanette Borges</title>
		<link>http://mediaroots.org/senate-bill-s-1867-seeks-military-powers-against-americans/comment-page-1/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jeanette Borges]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 05:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/mediaroots/senate-bill-s-1867-seeks-military-powers-against-americans/#comment-227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ammendment does not apply to American citizens. You have to read it. Udall&#039;s ammendment would take out the provision and give the discretion to Hillary Clinton and others. &quot;The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to citizens of the United States&quot;. I still don&#039;t like the bill but I read the thing becasue of this article http://tmtparty.info/http:/tmtparty.info/2011/11/26/liberals-and-aclu-try-to-sucker-punch-tea-party-over-s-1867-national-defense-authorization-act-for-fiscal-year-2012/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ammendment does not apply to American citizens. You have to read it. Udall&#8217;s ammendment would take out the provision and give the discretion to Hillary Clinton and others. &#8220;The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to citizens of the United States&#8221;. I still don&#8217;t like the bill but I read the thing becasue of this article <a href="http://tmtparty.info/http:/tmtparty.info/2011/11/26/liberals-and-aclu-try-to-sucker-punch-tea-party-over-s-1867-national-defense-authorization-act-for-fiscal-year-2012/" rel="nofollow">http://tmtparty.info/http:/tmtparty.info/2011/11/26/liberals-and-aclu-try-to-sucker-punch-tea-party-over-s-1867-national-defense-authorization-act-for-fiscal-year-2012/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.620 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2026-05-31 04:15:07 -->

<!-- Compression = gzip -->