<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supreme Court Grants Corporations More Power</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mediaroots.org/supreme-court-removes-another-barrier-to-corporate-ownership-of-elections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mediaroots.org/supreme-court-removes-another-barrier-to-corporate-ownership-of-elections/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2018 16:55:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carolay</title>
		<link>http://mediaroots.org/supreme-court-removes-another-barrier-to-corporate-ownership-of-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carolay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 03:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/mediaroots/supreme-court-removes-another-barrier-to-corporate-ownership-of-elections/#comment-192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[a provincial Supreme Court judge to me, my cinlet, back in the early 80s, something like:- Of course the law is fair and equitable. Of course the division of assets is based on 50/50. But it depends on the meaning of 50/50. -Like &quot;it depends on the meaning of  &#039;is&#039;&quot;, if you can catch the meaning of that meaning as your jaw drops. Not in expectation.We&#039;re in an age where not only our words are being redefined. Our phrases, our idioms, our sentences, our stories, our traditions are under attack.Not Me9tis enough, not multicultural enough. We&#039;re never &quot;enough&quot;. Because judges, and the rest, are not man enough.No balls left means the game is over...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a provincial Supreme Court judge to me, my cinlet, back in the early 80s, something like:- Of course the law is fair and equitable. Of course the division of assets is based on 50/50. But it depends on the meaning of 50/50. -Like &#8220;it depends on the meaning of  &#8216;is'&#8221;, if you can catch the meaning of that meaning as your jaw drops. Not in expectation.We&#8217;re in an age where not only our words are being redefined. Our phrases, our idioms, our sentences, our stories, our traditions are under attack.Not Me9tis enough, not multicultural enough. We&#8217;re never &#8220;enough&#8221;. Because judges, and the rest, are not man enough.No balls left means the game is over&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://mediaroots.org/supreme-court-removes-another-barrier-to-corporate-ownership-of-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 09:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/mediaroots/supreme-court-removes-another-barrier-to-corporate-ownership-of-elections/#comment-191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Corporate Personhood is has been twisted into a Machiavellian plutocracy.  Our Founding Father Thomas Jefferson wanted to prevent &quot;monopolies in commerce.&quot;  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corporate Personhood is has been twisted into a Machiavellian plutocracy.  Our Founding Father Thomas Jefferson wanted to prevent &#8220;monopolies in commerce.&#8221;  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
