A transcript of Media Roots Radio - Breaking Apart the Official 9/11 Conspiracy Theory may be found here:
http://www.mediaroots.org/mr-radio-transcript-911-coincidence-theory.php

Great show, too bad 911blogger took down your link fast. I just wanted to mention one very curious fact about the twin towers' destruction that is almost always overlooked, but easy to understand by lay people (you kind of touched on it but this might give it more impact). I came across it while reading "Men of Steel" by Karl Koch III, the contractor who built the towers, who talked to Tom Petrizzo, the subcontractor responsible for delivering the 6,000 floor decking and joist panels to the construction site in the early 70's, and who worked on the demolition trucking team removing the debris 30 years later: "I didn't see one floor deck come here with a bar joist in it. They must have disintegrated --- There were 6,000 of them ... There's stuff crumpled up, but go identify it as a floor deck if you can. I couldn't believe it -- not one floor panel ..."

I have given this some thought over the years and wondered how the panels were so completely destroyed, thinking that the explosives must have been widely dispersed on each floor, intimately in contact with all the floor panels. I know it is speculation, but you have to come up with plausible ways to bring down the buildings that match the videos, ways to pull off a clandestine demolition to show that it is not as impossible as it might seem. Go to:

http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2010/06/29/det-cord-and-concrete-slab/

and you can see one person's guess at how this was done using det cord run through the electrical wiring channels that are encased in the concrete floor panels six feet apart. This would make for an evenly dispersed explosive charge, whose energy would be closely coupled to the floor structure. I think this is the most likely method, easy enough to do if you have a contract to "upgrade" the wiring for any number of reasons, like a new security system--as was done in the years after the 1993 attack. I have come to see the 1993 attack (with a hand from the FBI) as the initial step to 9/11--a long process. Whether or not det cord was used, I think many agree that a number of different explosive or cutting materials were used. But as for the floor panels, if you watch the towers fall looking under the curtain of falling debris, you can see each floor being explosively destroyed in a rapid sequence down the building.

At any rate, the missing floor panels, I think are key to understanding how the towers were brought down and everything and everybody inside turned into small particles, unlike what you would expect in a far less violent, solely gravity-driven collapse.

Well done guys. Great show. Good vibe. You touch all the bases and impart the info and analysis clearly and simply. I've got this show bookmarked and I'm going to forward it to folks who needs an easy comprehensive intro to 9/11

Charles, yes we have an RSS to our podcast:
http://mediaroots.org/mediaroots-radio-podcast

Also we recommend subscribing via Itunes, just type in Media Roots Radio to the podcast search bar and you can get our episodes directly downloaded to your computer or smart phone.

What is interesting, and ironically iconic, about Ted Olson's involvement with 9/11, vis a vis his wife, is his association with the Supreme Court by way of his position as Solicitor General: by decrying these attacks and mourning, publicly, the loss of his wife, he invokes, almost literally, a cry of anguish from the hallowed marble halls of American Tradition; as if to say we were attacked at the institutional core of our belief systems.