<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dr. Stephanie Kelton: Modern Money Theory Explained</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mediaroots.org/dr-stephanie-kelton-modern-money-theory-explained/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mediaroots.org/dr-stephanie-kelton-modern-money-theory-explained/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2018 16:55:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: umbrarchist</title>
		<link>http://mediaroots.org/dr-stephanie-kelton-modern-money-theory-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[umbrarchist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 12:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/mediaroots/dr-stephanie-kelton-modern-money-theory-explained/#comment-315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is money more important than physics?

She does not discuss the manufacture of technology.  But that technology wears out because of PHYSICS.  Where does &quot;Planned Obsolescence&quot; fit into it?  How many trillions have Americans lost on the depreciation of badly designed junk?

Google &quot;Economic Wargames&quot; timgar]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is money more important than physics?</p>
<p>She does not discuss the manufacture of technology.  But that technology wears out because of PHYSICS.  Where does &#8220;Planned Obsolescence&#8221; fit into it?  How many trillions have Americans lost on the depreciation of badly designed junk?</p>
<p>Google &#8220;Economic Wargames&#8221; timgar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
