<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Architects &amp; Engineers – Solving the Mystery of WTC 7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mediaroots.org/architects-engineers-solving-the-mystery-of-wtc-7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mediaroots.org/architects-engineers-solving-the-mystery-of-wtc-7/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2018 16:55:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: psikeyhackr</title>
		<link>http://mediaroots.org/architects-engineers-solving-the-mystery-of-wtc-7/comment-page-1/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[psikeyhackr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 00:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/mediaroots/architects-engineers-solving-the-mystery-of-wtc-7/#comment-197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AE911Truth is So Screwed Up.

Let&#039;s face one simple fact.  Architecture and Structural Engineering are really old.  There are building around the world over 1000 years old.  Newtonian Physics is 300 years old.  So let&#039;s quit trying to pretend that this is rocket science.  It is just that it was not possible to produce huge quantities of steel until the late 18000s so skyscrapers were not possible before then.

But I asked Richard Gage about the distributions of steel and concrete down the towers in May of 2008 when he did his dog and pony show at Chicago Circle Campus.  First he looked at me like I had grown a second head.  Then he said the NIST was not releasing accurate blue prints.

Gravity woks the same way all over the planet.  The dimensions and number of columns in the WTC are known.  If Richard Gage and his buddies are competent they should be able to come up with pretty good numbers without the blue prints.

But curiously you cannot find that data on any skyscrapers around the world.  How can Potential Energy and the Conservation of Momentum be analyzed without that?

Google &quot;tons of steel&quot; &quot;tons of concrete&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AE911Truth is So Screwed Up.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s face one simple fact.  Architecture and Structural Engineering are really old.  There are building around the world over 1000 years old.  Newtonian Physics is 300 years old.  So let&#8217;s quit trying to pretend that this is rocket science.  It is just that it was not possible to produce huge quantities of steel until the late 18000s so skyscrapers were not possible before then.</p>
<p>But I asked Richard Gage about the distributions of steel and concrete down the towers in May of 2008 when he did his dog and pony show at Chicago Circle Campus.  First he looked at me like I had grown a second head.  Then he said the NIST was not releasing accurate blue prints.</p>
<p>Gravity woks the same way all over the planet.  The dimensions and number of columns in the WTC are known.  If Richard Gage and his buddies are competent they should be able to come up with pretty good numbers without the blue prints.</p>
<p>But curiously you cannot find that data on any skyscrapers around the world.  How can Potential Energy and the Conservation of Momentum be analyzed without that?</p>
<p>Google &#8220;tons of steel&#8221; &#8220;tons of concrete&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
